First High Risk of 2008?

It seems extremely unorthodox to have such a frivolous "tradition". It seems to pointless to waste time trying to predict when the first high risk will occur, when in fact what you should be doing is letting mother nature, and life itself unfold as it should, naturally and patiently.


Are you kidding? What are you, the weather Gandhi? It's just for fun. Us speculating and being silly isn't hindering nature and life's ability to "unfold" so take a chill pill, and take part in the festivities.
 
It seems extremely unorthodox to have such a frivolous "tradition". It seems to pointless to waste time trying to predict when the first high risk will occur, when in fact what you should be doing is letting mother nature, and life itself unfold as it should, naturally and patiently.

Dude calm down. It's all in fun and it's harmless.
 
I like Joel W.'s idea; I'll go with the leap year outbreak as well (2/29), though a little farther S and E in the LIT-MEM-JAN triangle.

EDIT: My 600th post to kick off 2008! nice.
 
March 14th.. ArkLaTex up into southern Missouri and eastern Ok.

And Andrew get a reality check. This is what we do as chasers. We summize and "forecast" sever weather. What is the difference in guessing at the 1st high risk using climitalogical data and going out on a chase "guessing" there may be a tornado in a certain area that day. Your in the wrong hobby kid. But we all knew that already. lol
 
Back
Top