Also keep in mind it's quite likely similar stretches of "diamonds in the rough" events have likely occurred in recent times, but due to the lower numbers of chasers spread about in the Plains before then, it's less likely people saw those particular events.
- It is now common for at least a dozen chasers to still be chasing after sunset. Thus many after dark tornadoes that probably were missed in years past now are captured.
- It is now common for there to be hundreds of chasers out between May 1 and June 15 because that seems to be when the vast majority of chasecationers come out. Thus there is usually someone in every stretch of the chaseable area of the US from eastern MT though southwest TX and eastward to Dixie Alley and Michigan. Thus more tornadoes are seen even on less evident days simply due to increased chaser sampling. Some of the tornadoes occurring in relatively remote areas in the corners of chaseable terrain in the US or well removed from the highest SPC risk area end up being more photogenic than those closer to the center of Tornado Alley or in the highest risk areas.
- It is now common for dozens of chasers to be on the same tornadic storm in many different storm relative locations. Thus it is more likely that someone will capture a truly remarkable angle of a tornado, whether it be from up close or way back with the structure above it.
20 years ago, none of these statements were probably valid. Hell, maybe even 10 years ago it would've been a stretch to believe some of these statements.
So are good years truly good meteorologically, or is it just a better sampling by storm chasers? Also, how much does improved camera/vehicle technology play into this? Probably a lot. A lot of chasers probably have 20+MP cameras and really nice HD/4K cameras that have ever better technology. Higher res images and videos with less noise and better white balance etc. The documentation has improved.