• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Chase Case #4 (2010 Version)

18Z to 21Z is a big gap of time with the top about to blow in several areas. I still like where I am in SW Iowa and will probably hang tight for the moment, but if convection blows up nearby, I'm on it... hard to say where I'll be at 21Z given that it is three hours away.


Poetry, man. It's beautiful. <Sniff!> :D

Would you believe that was unintentional? ... poet and didn't even know it. Lol.
 
I'm going to drift ever so slightly S out of Salina toward the better moisture. I'll head down 35 to McPherson, KS and await later data.
 
After chase case #3 I'm pretty relieved to be in a T-watch area for lunch. The surface low circulation seems to be moving ESE, bringing the backed winds with it and into the better moisture. I'm going to mosey from Bee-AH-trice, NE south toward Junction City, KS. From there I can either join the growing mob around Wichita/El Dorado/Salina and play with the Hutchison CuNimb, or shift toward Topeka or Hiawatha. I'd like to get my eyes on the sky to see if the convection will bust through the more stable air in NE Kansas. If the sky looks good, I'll just deviate east direct to Topeka, KS and watch the dewpoints carefully.
 
Well, obviously, a three hour gap between updates is a long time. I like the situation along the CF / DL much better than up to the NE. I agree with Robert about the subsidence potential. I'm going to move from Wichita to El Dorado, KS to give myself an extra 30 miles ahead of the boundary, and be ready to move when things start to fire.
 
This is tough. I like where I am in Salina, but I can find a lot to the south and northeast of where I am. I think I'm gonna head east a few miles to Junction City and get a change of scenery.
 
I'll stay in Onawa for now. I have good road options so I can head south if anything happens there.

Edit: After seeing that line on Satellite to the SW I think I'll move slightly that direction to Fremont, NE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm nudging down to Lincoln--not with any great conviction, just hedging my bets for 21Z. I see the crisper line of Cu's to the west stretching down into KS on satellite, but right now I'll hang east of them. Moisture could certainly be better, but it does seem to be improving. Now I kind of wish I'd played farther south, but I expected the low center to translate to the northeast, not the southwest. Okee-dokey, I opted for the northern play and I'll stick to my guns. After all, the area is in a PDS, though how that happened is beyond me. In real life, we'd have more model data for upper levels, and I think that would explain a lot. (Not complaining in the least, Jesse, just making note.)
 
Pretty obvious by mid morning, that with the surface low in wrn KS that I was to far west, so by 17z I was bidding DDC farewell and on the road heading east. Will grab a quick lunch on the go, and head to McPherson, KS and await the next suite of data.
 
After arriving in Fairbury, Nebraska and checking the 18z data i see no need to change plans. I still think the dewpoints will be good enough for this area and will hang here for awhile.
 
Back
Top