rdale EF5 Joined Mar 1, 2004 Messages 7,562 Location Lansing, MI Nov 8, 2006 #16 "It seems the NAM is MUCH improved over last year though." This model didn't exist last year...
Mickey Ptak EF5 Joined Dec 8, 2003 Messages 802 Location Bridge Creek, OK Nov 8, 2006 #17 Mike Hollingshead said: http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/AVN/OFFAVN/avn_usUS_250_spd_162.gif Click to expand... Mike Hollingshead said: That is quite the upper jet! Click to expand... 200+kt! Just imagine if that was @ 500mb. Chase that buddy! lol! That would make 3/12/06 seem like a walk in the park...
Mike Hollingshead said: http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/AVN/OFFAVN/avn_usUS_250_spd_162.gif Click to expand... Mike Hollingshead said: That is quite the upper jet! Click to expand... 200+kt! Just imagine if that was @ 500mb. Chase that buddy! lol! That would make 3/12/06 seem like a walk in the park...
Bart_Comstock EF5 Joined May 4, 2005 Messages 1,138 Location Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Nov 9, 2006 #18 rdale said: "It seems the NAM is MUCH improved over last year though." This model didn't exist last year... Click to expand... Well that is technically an improvement.
rdale said: "It seems the NAM is MUCH improved over last year though." This model didn't exist last year... Click to expand... Well that is technically an improvement.
Andrea Griffa EF5 Joined Jun 26, 2004 Messages 1,104 Location Italy/Tornado Alley Nov 11, 2006 #19 995 mb in Oklahoma at 90h? Mmmm...It sounds good. http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rnamavn901.png