• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Season over?

Gotta hate those mid-May death ridges :(
msl_uv850_z500!Geopotential%20500%20hPa%20and%20Temperature%20at%20850%20hPa!168!North%20America!pop!od!oper!public_plots!2010051600!!chart.gif
 
Latest runs of the GooFuS have given up any signs of a ridge forming anytime between now and the next couple of weeks :) Not realiable at all, but combine that with the continuous plotting by the ECMWF of a Rocky Mountain trough it's apparent we got plenty of chasing coming.
 
The moral of the story: don't cry at the drop of a hat. The models aren't perfect and things change.
 
These mid-May ridges.......separate the chaser men from the chaser boys.
I have to chuckle, because EVERY year about this time we have this topic in S.T.
Just ask my chase partner Doren Berge, I have a little saying that I run by him, and it's said with disdain: "May / Schmay". In layman's terms...this means that I really disdain chasing in May...for the most part. That's why I opt to chase beginning the first few days in June. This year is no exception, as I'm flying into Omaha on May 29th. I absolutely LOVE chasing in June.
 
Wow, what an awesome surprise at the GFS to see a trough like that come ashore around the 20th, couple that with the 18/19th days you will have several days of possible chasing.
 
One thing I'm not a fan of at this point on the ECMWF is the little low that just sits over the Great Lakes, and the high down near the gulf. Keeping that trough from really ejecting out much at this point.

Of course, the GFS is the opposite really plowing that thing into the nation's midsection by midweek.
 
Others have pointed this out, but I'm just flabbergasted by the discrepancies between ECMWF and GFS on this system due next weekend. Yes the ECMWF has a deep meridional trough setting up chases beginning Sat May 22 and staying put about 3 days or so. But the GFS has a less amplified solution, with a wave that ploughs into the upper Mississippi valley the next day (May 23), followed by ridging in the West. Could the two be any more different??! I like (and am inclined to agree with, based on past experience) the ECMWF solution, and FWIW, the GEFS ensembles tend to agree with it as well.
 
Others have pointed this out, but I'm just flabbergasted by the discrepancies between ECMWF and GFS on this system due next weekend. Yes the ECMWF has a deep meridional trough setting up chases beginning Sat May 22 and staying put about 3 days or so. But the GFS has a less amplified solution, with a wave that ploughs into the upper Mississippi valley the next day (May 23), followed by ridging in the West. Could the two be any more different??! I like (and am inclined to agree with, based on past experience) the ECMWF solution, and FWIW, the GEFS ensembles tend to agree with it as well.

I like the ECMWF solution more for two reason, A: I want to have a string of possible chase days, and B: it's far more consistent than the GFS is. The GFS doesnt know what to predict it seems.
 
I like the ECMWF solution more for two reason, A: I want to have a string of possible chase days, and B: it's far more consistent than the GFS is. The GFS doesnt know what to predict it seems.

Haven't noticed the GFS being any worse than the ECMWF this season. Almost seems fashionable to bash the GFS anymore.
 
Wow, latest GFS sure shows quite a bit of nice chasing should it verify. Sat-Tue... central plains through upper midwest featuring big CAPE and reasonable storm speeds. (note: possibly friday too -- those of you planning your chase vacations late next week might have picked a nice time)
 
After today's 12z GFS I just bought a small bit of land and a few farm animals. Taking up farming now, since the season is toast. Should start a thread on "what did you do after May 10, 2010."
 
Back
Top