Morgan Palmer
EF5
I'm not a technical radar expert, and I've never seen this addressed in anything I've read. Despite the narrow pulse width of 88D, I imagine there is significant absorption of the energy by the time the beam goes (lets say) directly through the eyewall.
How much might a current representation of the opposite eyewall be diminished?
Thanks for the help (good to know now and in the future).
mp
How much might a current representation of the opposite eyewall be diminished?
Thanks for the help (good to know now and in the future).
mp