• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

07/15/08 FCST: MN

Joined
Jul 23, 2004
Messages
497
Location
Iowa City, IA
Chase target:
Warsaw, MN (6 miles west of Faribault).

Timing and storm mode:
Storms will initiate first in WI, and back build to the west into the target area by 5 PM CDT. [FONT=&quot]Multicells will be the dominant mode, with a few embedded supercells possible.[/FONT]

Synopsis:
The ULVL flow will continue to transition towards an increasingly zonal regime over the NRN tier of states in the CNTRL CONUS, with a number of disturbances riding E within this flow. Over the next 36-60 hours, a low-amplitude, positively-tilted trough will begin to dig into the PAC NW. S of the strongest H5-H3 flow, a weak H5 vorticity lobe will track through SRN MN on day-2. Otherwise, winds at the mid- and upper-levels will remain seasonably weak to the south of the jet stream. At the SFC, a CF currently over the SERN CONUS will wash out while return flow commences in the upper Midwest. Another CF will drop S into MN and the Dakotas on day 2, and this will be the focus for active WX during the afternoon and evening hours. A weak temperature gradient will exist across this boundary, causing it to act more as a pressure trough.

Discussion:
A zone of diffluent ULVL flow will overspread CNTRL MN as an H5 S/WV approaches the region. Bulk shear will increase to 40 kts beneath the vorticity lobe/speed max. However, LLVL directional shear will remain modest due to veering SFC flow, with SFC-3km SRH AOB 150m2/s2. Moisture return will really increase on day-2, owing primarily to evapotranspiration. By 00Z, 7/16, SFC dewpoints should rise into the mid 70’s near the boundary, while surface-based LI’s increase to -9C. MLCAPEs should reach 3000J/kg beneath steep mid-level lapse rates of 8C/km. Pre-frontal LLVL flow will remain veered.

I'll be available for nowcasting - PM me.

- bill
11:30 CDT, 07/14/08
 
Last edited by a moderator:
07/15/08 FCST: MN NOW NE!!

Tor Warned storm 19 miles SE of O'Neill, NE- moving SE. Strong rotation both on radar and visually. Nice discreet cell moving SE. Mid 60's plus DP through most of central and eastern NE right now..
 
Back
Top