Mike Smith
Hi Mike,
And I do admit a skepticism about acuweather.com though that's not to say you're personally subject to GCC (so you may honestly believe everything independently, that's all possible), but interesting to read about:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=AccuWeather%27s_science_for_hire
Jason, I am extraordinarily busy this afternoon. However, I want to correct the record on this. Until your post, I had never even heard of the GCC.
And, my colleagues at AccuWeather have a full range of views regarding global warming from extreme skepticism to belief the IPCC is right on the money. There is no corporate position on GW nor is there any pressure to believe one thing or another.
AccuWeather has a global warming blog: http://global-warming.accuweather.com/ that attempts to cover both sides of the issue. The Stormtrack readers can try it for themselves and decide.
As to "science-for-hire" I believe we all get salaries. And, I believe our all our institutions and employers are paid for services rendered. There is nothing wrong or sinister about that. There are quality scientists on both sides of the GW issue. I can personally vouch for the quality of people and science at AccuWeather on the issue of global warming. There is zero pressure to believe one thing or another. We want decisions to be made using the best science out there.
Mike