• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

What would be the perfect setup for a massive tornado outbreak

STurner

EF2
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
182
Location
Shawnee, KS 66217
As far as numbers go what would be a perfect setup for a massvie tornado outbreak with over 100 tornadoes confirmed. Like for instance CAPE, wind shear, winds with height, LCL's, LLJ, SRH, low/mid level lapse rates, temperatures, and dewpoints etc. Something that would be the ultimate chase. Any ideas on what you would be looking for to get a perfect setup.
 
Shane, a good idea would be to go back and look at case studies from big tornado outbreaks. There's tons of data out there available on Greensburg, Oklahoma City, Andover, Parkersburg... Etc. Etc. For the large numbers of tornadoes take a look at the big streak in May 2003.
 
Jon Davies has a great page on his site with the parameters for supercells/tornadoes. I used to check it a lot to get an idea of what to look for, parameter-wise. There are tons of other things, though ... like synoptic and mesoscale features and observations that tell you how the atmosphere is actually behaving out there. The models and parameters give you a good starting point and a general idea, but you've got to pay attention to what's actually happening as a day progresses. It always seems to take me two or three chases to really fall into the groove with forecasting and obs for some reason. Every spring I feel a bit like I'm starting over with all of it.
 
This is probably the page that Mike is referring to: http://members.cox.net/jondavies1/tornado_fcsting/sprcll_tors.htm

The table in the middle of the page gives you the parameters in a nutshell. For a look at more convective indices: http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lsx/science/indices.php
In the link above, ISOLD = isolated, FEW = few :), SCT = scattered, NMRS = numerous.

You will find those numbers on the bottom of a SKEW-T (among other places) which is either a real or model sampling of the various layers of the atmosphere.

Note that you asked about an OUTBREAK, while the numbers above do not predict outbreaks themselves they are related. (Clearly if you have conditions favorable for supercells and significant tornadoes over a wide geographical area, then you have conditions favorable for an outbreak).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top