Andrea Griffa
EF5
Hi all guys
I was making a little thinking about the future of the season and I tried to imagine how could it be the month of may.
I was thinking that the season has started up so early, this year, and if we can do a comparison, we could compare the last month of March and the whole month of April of this year to a may of a normal year.(yesterday we had 4000 of cape for example). As to me this is a sign that the season is just well set. If someone told me that now we're on may, I could believe to him.
In this way a deductive reasoning would lead me to think that the next month of may could be like a normal june and the next end of may could be an early july.
If this reasoning is right we could have only the first 10-15 days of may in wich we could chase and then we could have a long period of high pressure, not characterized by the dynamism of may. If that's correct we would have high temperatures during may and few severe storms.
Besides we can't forget the Nina....
So I wanna make a conclusion: I don't want to say that this arguement comes from a synoptic deduction, but it's simply a reasoning that comes from a little suspect. We all know that meteorology is not simple to understand and a lot of time its behaviour is different from the one we imagine.
So, guys, try to tell me what do you think about this theory and I hope that someone will simply destroy it.
I was making a little thinking about the future of the season and I tried to imagine how could it be the month of may.
I was thinking that the season has started up so early, this year, and if we can do a comparison, we could compare the last month of March and the whole month of April of this year to a may of a normal year.(yesterday we had 4000 of cape for example). As to me this is a sign that the season is just well set. If someone told me that now we're on may, I could believe to him.
In this way a deductive reasoning would lead me to think that the next month of may could be like a normal june and the next end of may could be an early july.
If this reasoning is right we could have only the first 10-15 days of may in wich we could chase and then we could have a long period of high pressure, not characterized by the dynamism of may. If that's correct we would have high temperatures during may and few severe storms.
Besides we can't forget the Nina....
So I wanna make a conclusion: I don't want to say that this arguement comes from a synoptic deduction, but it's simply a reasoning that comes from a little suspect. We all know that meteorology is not simple to understand and a lot of time its behaviour is different from the one we imagine.
So, guys, try to tell me what do you think about this theory and I hope that someone will simply destroy it.