ABlaser
Enthusiast
warren,
you were right, in addition to a replacement cycle, there was a cooler pool of SST's in place..that was the remaining upwelled water from hurricanes dennis and cindy, which passed through in the month prior.
while winds and pressures could go down in the hours preceding landfall...the surge will take longer to weaken, since the mass of all that water is heavier and slower to respond.
if this storm goes into SW LA..warren is right again...this is crappy chase area.
you were right, in addition to a replacement cycle, there was a cooler pool of SST's in place..that was the remaining upwelled water from hurricanes dennis and cindy, which passed through in the month prior.
while winds and pressures could go down in the hours preceding landfall...the surge will take longer to weaken, since the mass of all that water is heavier and slower to respond.
if this storm goes into SW LA..warren is right again...this is crappy chase area.
If I remember right, there was a cooler pool of water off the LA coast which rapidly reduced Katrina's strength, but the storm surge still maintained it's Cat 5 status. It looks like the waters are much warmer off the LA coast than when Katrina struck. (Someone correct me if this is not accurate).
So, given the forward speed and warmer waters, I am surmising the deciding factor will be shear.
As far as the potential landfall strike zones goes, I surveyed the area several years ago and unless there has been a serious infrastructure advancement, the areas along the LA coast are very difficult to intercept from if you are seeking coastal action. Same can be said for the areas from Port Author south to Galveston, then west to Port Lavaca and then west/sw to Corpus.
Warren