Jeff Snyder
EF5
It seems that, for the majority of tropical cyclones that make landfall, there are no observations close to the NHC "max wind speed". Of course, the coverage of the strongest winds in a hurricane is often very, very small, and ASOS/AWOS stations can be spaced relatively far apart, giving ample opportunity for the strongest winds to go unsampled.
New Orleans staying relatively dry (i.e. no surge flooding within the city) is no surprise given that they likely only experienced TS-force winds and were, at the closest, approx. 60 miles from the eye. The water were still able to "lap" over the levees.... I agree that if the eye were to have passed 30-40 mi closer to NOLA, the city may have been under water in places. Regardless, Gustav came close enough to the city for it not to be a "false alarm" in my book. The media hype before hand was troubling, and hearing/reading an occasional comment about how NOLA was able to stay dry after a hit from Cat 3 Gustav is disheartening and a massive disservice to all people within that area. I'd hate to see folks become complacent again after many false alarms (again, I DON'T consider this one a false alarm given that a strong hurricane still passed 60 miles from downtown), and we'd just end up with the same pre-Katrina mentality.
It also tends to bug me when people talk about "hurricane-force winds" when the ob is 50 mph sustained with 75 mph gusts. That is TS-force winds. SUSTAINED winds are the notable data point when looking at TS vs. hurricane-force winds.
For what it's worth, the AOML analysis of Gustav near landfall shows an area of 75-80 kts over water, but nothing terribly impressive:
1330 UTC wind analysis
New Orleans staying relatively dry (i.e. no surge flooding within the city) is no surprise given that they likely only experienced TS-force winds and were, at the closest, approx. 60 miles from the eye. The water were still able to "lap" over the levees.... I agree that if the eye were to have passed 30-40 mi closer to NOLA, the city may have been under water in places. Regardless, Gustav came close enough to the city for it not to be a "false alarm" in my book. The media hype before hand was troubling, and hearing/reading an occasional comment about how NOLA was able to stay dry after a hit from Cat 3 Gustav is disheartening and a massive disservice to all people within that area. I'd hate to see folks become complacent again after many false alarms (again, I DON'T consider this one a false alarm given that a strong hurricane still passed 60 miles from downtown), and we'd just end up with the same pre-Katrina mentality.
It also tends to bug me when people talk about "hurricane-force winds" when the ob is 50 mph sustained with 75 mph gusts. That is TS-force winds. SUSTAINED winds are the notable data point when looking at TS vs. hurricane-force winds.
For what it's worth, the AOML analysis of Gustav near landfall shows an area of 75-80 kts over water, but nothing terribly impressive:
1330 UTC wind analysis
Last edited by a moderator: