Sam Sagnella
EF5
Pressure is down to 920mb and winds are up to 150mph...insane strengthening is occurring, absolutely insane. Katrina's 902mb record of the season in jeopardy?
Originally posted by Jeff Snyder+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Jeff Snyder)</div><!--QuoteBegin-Benjamin SipprellRECON ...
142 Knots! or 163 MPH
Cat 5 has been reached!
Central pressure of 923 mb
This at 17:02:40 or 1:02 ET
Stadium type eyewall ... interesting. Thoughts anyone?
Ben,
That's max FLIGHT-LEVEL winds, not surface winds. There's a rule-of-thumb 10% reduction to get to surface winds... So, 143kt max flight-level is about 130kt surface winds, which is still cat 4. The 923mb is also a little high for Cat 5.
That said, I can't see why we wouldn't have a cat 5 by later afternoon. Changes in wind speeds usually lag changes in central pressure, was has dropped 11mb in 90 minutes! The 11am central time recon had 134mb, while the 12:30pm central time recon has 123mb... That's insane! I'd find it statistically odd if the recon report just happens to occur at the minimum of central pressure during a rapid strengthening period, so I wouldn't be surprised to see <915mb by evening (or earlier). Rita is a relatively compact storm, so that pressure perturbation isn't spread over a very large area like it was with Katrina (which was Cat 5 with <905mb cp).[/b]
Originally posted by HAltschule
2:30pm Water Vapor loop shows that Rita is taking a jog to the NW (around 310) at this time. If this continues, which is a little earlier than NHC Progs., it may move further north than forecast. For some reason, (and unsupported by the model consensus I might add), I think we have to watch out for Houston still. There is a good chance that this thing may recurve further north than most are thinking right now. And that puts Houston in ringer. Just my $0.02 from this seasoned speculative Met.
Originally posted by HAltschule
2:30pm Water Vapor loop shows that Rita is taking a jog to the NW (around 310) at this time. If this continues, which is a little earlier than NHC Progs., it may move further north than forecast. For some reason, (and unsupported by the model consensus I might add), I think we have to watch out for Houston still. There is a good chance that this thing may recurve further north than most are thinking right now. And that puts Houston in ringer. Just my $0.02 from this seasoned speculative Met.
Originally posted by Andrew Khan
I wouldn't be surprised if it went passed the threshold for Cat 5. This I assume is possible?
Originally posted by Jeff Snyder+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Jeff Snyder)</div><!--QuoteBegin-Andrew KhanI wouldn't be surprised if it went passed the threshold for Cat 5. This I assume is possible?
No, this isn't possible. Cat 5 has winds >155mph. There is no upper bound for Cat 5.[/b]
Originally posted by Missouri Stormspotter
that seems to be the concensus on the the various weather forums... I wonder what NHC is thinking...
Originally posted by Andrew Khan+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Andrew Khan)</div>Originally posted by Jeff Snyder@
<!--QuoteBegin-Andrew Khan
I wouldn't be surprised if it went passed the threshold for Cat 5. This I assume is possible?
No, this isn't possible. Cat 5 has winds >155mph. There is no upper bound for Cat 5.
Jeff, why is this so? What can keep it from reaching greater capacity? Why does it just STOP there?[/b]