afischer
EF4
With the EML, there is a significant cap which the NAM magically eliminates around 5 PM local time. I say magically, but it appears that it is actually bringing the shortwave through, a shift in wind, additional lift, and this is tending to erase the cap. However, I feel that much of this is convective contamination... contamination which may not happen at all if convective initiation is not reached. Stupid feedbacks!
Strongly agree. Isn't the NAM wonderful?
Haven't looked as closely at NE, but I'm still holding out some hope for possible high-based supercells along the dryline in KS. We'll need the stratus to erode ahead of the dryline to get really strong heating/mixing in order to remove a substantial cap. Coverage would be spotty at best. I'd definitely settle for a nicely structured supercell but that even seems a stretch at this point. Will know more in the morning.