Randy Zipser
EF2
I am posting this here not as any kind of political statement, but rather due to its relevancy to the meteorological community, including storm chasers. Of course, that body of water has always been the source of the most essential ingredient in the formation of Cb's that produce the vortexes that we all like to chase each spring, so no discussion can ever take place in any chaser report without its name being mentioned, or at least, implied. Even the National Hurricane Center and the Storm Prediction Center are already using the 'Gulf of America' in Cyclone Reports and daily Convective Outlooks and Mesoscale Discussions, respectively.
Since no formal treaty has been signed (to date) between the United States and the government of Mexico, which does not recognize the change, the controversy will continue as to the correct name in meteorological- and climate-related scientific journals, leading to possible confusion going forward. FWIW, earlier today I also heard a report on either CNN or MSNBC that Google is also now involved in a legal controversy for recognizing 'The Gulf of America' on its search engine.
The following attachments are two different viewpoints about the 'Gulf of America:' one from CNN on May 8th and the other from The Wall Street Journal on May 9, 2025:
Since no formal treaty has been signed (to date) between the United States and the government of Mexico, which does not recognize the change, the controversy will continue as to the correct name in meteorological- and climate-related scientific journals, leading to possible confusion going forward. FWIW, earlier today I also heard a report on either CNN or MSNBC that Google is also now involved in a legal controversy for recognizing 'The Gulf of America' on its search engine.
The following attachments are two different viewpoints about the 'Gulf of America:' one from CNN on May 8th and the other from The Wall Street Journal on May 9, 2025:
Attachments
Last edited: