• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

5/22/07 FCST: TX / OK / KS / NE / SD

Status
Not open for further replies.
Currently in Hoxie, Kansas and over the last hour two things have happened - the cumulus has morphed into congestus towers ( still weak but definate transition ). The other is a clear boundary is now visible to the west, with very little CU, therefore a little NE feels right from the visual perspective.
 
Recently arrived in Wakeeney, KS with Mike Kruze and Geoff Fink. Cu field continues to maintain/develop slightly just west and southwest of our location, INVOF Oberlin/Garden City corridor. Appears from visual observation that we have a little cap erosion left to do, as small cumulus buildups are beginning to wax and wane, struggling against said cap, but a nice llvl kinematic environment has set up just to our east, and storms should strengthen quickly after initiation occurs.

I am hoping the cap holds further south and prevents interference from additional convection, but road options out of Wakeeney would allow for fairly quick repositioning should that be the case. Good luck to everyone out today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top