The testing process isn't supposed to be adversarial in nature Gordon, it's designed to discover, document, and report issues so they can be addressed before production. I'm also clueless as to why you would imply that Chris and Cherie are biased. They're actually trying to help you produce a better product, but sometimes it seems as though this has escaped you somewhere along the line. These folks have bent over backwards to test your new amps and in a timely manner no less. For the record they're currently waiting for your 5th unit to arrive, because the previous 4 have all performed rather dismally as evidenced by the metrics. Their testing methodology is far and away the most well developed I've seen and the methods they use to score the units is head and shoulders above the rest. They've conducted testing at multiple locations using all four major carriers with your amps, and have provided head to head results against all comers. Your product has been given every opportunity to shine, but the test results do not verify.
As to your point about Jack, he has essentially had the better part of this year to test your units but we're still in a holding pattern. He also hasn't updated his website with any new information since November 2015, so it's all there for everyone to see. Who knows, maybe he's just tired of the rat race and doesn't get the same satisfaction as he once did from performing a thankless task. I'm going to leave you with a quote from his website regarding the newer 4G amps and hope that some of what I've said hits home as an alternative point of view that perhaps never occurred to you before now.