• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

If we were to have a "National Tornado Day"...June 8th?

Read this last night on the office shift log and when it popped into the better browser to ship it over to the weather radio. I'll let the forecaster who wrote it know it is being well received. He'll appreciate it.
 
Very interesting article but I am sure there is a few other dates that our just as bad for tornadoes.
 
Interesting, but rather surprised June 8th 1974 wasn't mentioned, unless I skipped right over it...multiple tornadoes in OKC and Tulsa areas, Emporia Ks F4...

RS
 
It's interesting how they still reference wind speeds from the old (no-longer-used) F-scale. Seems like since the new scale was implemented, all past tornadoes would automatically be re-adjusted...hence no more wind speeds over 205-210mph associated with any F4 or F5 tornadoes, be they past or present.
 
It's interesting how they still reference wind speeds from the old (no-longer-used) F-scale. Seems like since the new scale was implemented, all past tornadoes would automatically be re-adjusted...hence no more wind speeds over 205-210mph associated with any F4 or F5 tornadoes, be they past or present.

Nope, all tornadoes rated prior to the EF scale keep their rating. I think the main reason behind that is avoiding the chaos that would be caused in the records.

It would be interesting to look at certain dates and see if any days seem to be more conducive to tornadoes...would be helpful in planning days off, don't you think?
 
Of course it is the tornado damage that is being rated, not the wind speed of the tornado. I believe some tornadoes do have wind speeds greater than 205-220 MPH. It's just that not much survives these wind speeds in order to give us an upper bound. Perhaps one day, all tornadoes will be scanned with some device and we will know what the wind speed is of each tornado. TM
 
Back
Top