Andy Wehrle
EF5
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/...al/13188398.htm
Linked from that article posted above. ????? Says one was an F5.
Linked from that article posted above. ????? Says one was an F5.
I wonder if that's a case of the media taking a guess at the rating? It was probably based on reports from the Buckner Ridge area.Originally posted by Andy Wehrle
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/local/13188398.htm
Linked from that article posted above. ????? Says one was an F5.
Originally posted by Kevin Askew
Very could well have been an F-5 if the foreward speeds were reduced in this cell?
Originally posted by Kevin Askew
Yeah I understand that. It did appear F-3-F4 damage was present. Im saying that the fast foreward speeds may have contributed to the storms/tornadoes intensity. Meaning that if the storm itself had a 30 mph foreward NE speed as apposed to 50-60 mph, it might have been able to produce a more intense mesocyclone/tornado. The fast speeds, may have been responsible for shearing apart a more intense circulation. Just a theory I have discussed with a few chasers. I seen as well as Glenn Schubert, a very rapid rotating wall cloud ramp up & then become ragged then do over again before breifly touching after we lost it before Galatia IL. Should have tornadoed in my opinion, but did not. Plus might have contributed to funnels not touching down, as apposed to a slower foreward speed, touching down, being a more intense meso. In other words if the mean storm motion of the LEWP's- Sups was reduced to say 20-30 knts, It could have REALLY been alot worse.
Kevin