An editorial piece of very similar tone about May 29 from the Hutchinson paper specifically targeted "storm chasers", not locals, as the problem.
Quote from the Hutchinson article:
"A string of tornadoes tore through the county May 29. Emergency crews received a report of people trapped and possibly hurt in a home near Attica. Storm chasers clogged the roads and wouldn't pull over, slowing responders by six precious minutes."
In fact, the title of that editorial was:
"Out of the way -
Storm chasers slowed emergency response "
Stormtrack thread on this article:
http://stormtrack.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2402
My first picture of the term 'tourist' is a traveler who has come from afar, not someone local. Also, the Hutchinson article discussed how the said chasers come from all over the world and that there are many tour companies.
It's possible that the latest article didn't intend to cast chasers (as opposed to locals) in a bad light, but considering the content of that last editorial piece, and the fact that quotes were used from the same people in both articles, would only lead many chasers to believe that this article is taking the same stance against chasers.
I don't think the Eagle article alone is the cause for this latest reaction by chasers, but rather the trend we've been seeing with other articles seems to lead up to this one.
Just an opinion.