4/17/04 FCST: MIDWEST/GREAT LAKES

I think the depth of moisture could be alot worse. Looking at 12Z sounding for DVN, it's not that bad. DVN is the more favorable sounding I believe due to it's relation to the frontal boundary. I am more worried about lack of favorable Jet structure up to 6Z, and no signs of a significant shortwave to help in synoptic scale ascent. I think it will be a matter of timing/hoping something discrete can go before the arrival of the LLJ
 
Just posting the links to the 9hr RUC maps for this afternoon in IA for those who are interested while we're waiting for the 6hr update.

CAPE/CINH - http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/model/ruc0...hr_sfc_cape.gif - indicates instability along the WF in the 2000 range, along with a gap in inhibition.

Convergence - http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/model/ruc0...hr_sfc_mcli.gif - looks inviting along the boundary - there is a plume that extends from TX up across the dryline in KS - but doesn't appear deep enough to be hopeful about sfc based convection as of this particular run.

Helicities in the 500-600 range (another concern for any still considering the DL, although the panhandle is decent.) http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/model/ruc0...hr_sfc_sreh.gif

Vertical motion/mixing panels - http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/model/ruc0...9hr_925_mxr.gif - again, depth looks good in vicinity of boundary.

Looks to me like Iowa holds the ticket at this point ... won't be making the drive today, though - got the car in shape and it's just all tricked out - can't wait to use it now. All the best for those heading out -
 
Just took a look at the radar from KDMX at 0006Z....looks to be some convection starting.....maybe....very weak returns, but are consistent with t-storm development....look for a watch to be issued shortly,as MD stated earlier....so far, no EXPLOSIVE development however
 
OK....NOW there is EXPLOSIVE development:) i think somebody needs to start a now thread on these storms in NC IA
 
Back
Top