• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2/28/09 Forecast: AL GA SC FL

Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
70
Location
Anoka, MN
Can't believe no one has started one for tomorrow so I will take the plunge. Being really weak at this I'll rely on others to add expertise.

Set up to me is reminiscent of 2/18. As usual this time of year, moisture return/clearing is key so the threat seems very conditional. Nevertheless, if things get going I can see a repeat of last week. Very strong helicity values will be in place across northeast Georgia. Looks to be a daytime event for any discrete stuff.

Please elaborate on my weak forecast.
 
Yeah, I was debating starting a thread, but I couldn't add much to what SPC had already put out in its forecast.

Pros: Td's in the mid 50's to mid 60's already from central MS to AL. Today's lack of cloud cover south of the convective cluster is promising for tomorrow. With some decent daytime sunshine and strong (30-40kts @ 925mb) continued return flow, I'd say instability will not be a problem with potential SBCAPE AOA 1500 J/Kg over southern AL/GA. The sfc low should deepen and track across MS/AL/GA providing some forcing and enhanced sfc convergence. Also, lapse rates should steepen a bit at least in the mid levels with the developing low. If the trough can become a little more neutral-tilt before exiting the SE, a little backing of sfc winds from SW to a more SSW or S direction would help in developing low-level shear. The low itself should provide vorticity to the mix. Upper air dynamics also appear favorable for storm rotation with modestly large clockwise curved hodographs. And the approaching jet max appears to hint at a split or spreading leading edge, developing lift from divergence. Perhaps the overnight convection will result in a quasi-stationary E/W boundary focusing higher helicity values over building instability (more or less a hopeful speculation ;))

Cons: Conditional nature of return moisture and cloud cover. It's hard to predict exactly how today's convection will affect tomorrow's setup. How far south will the MCS develop overnight? How worked-over will the air become? How much cloud cover will be left to burn off? Will sfc winds back much with approaching trough/low? As with the 2/18 system, will it matter much? Of course, any comparison to last week's system would be incomplete without acknowledging the slightly weaker H3/H5 wind flow. Also, with SE systems typically sporting veered sfc wind profiles and at least semi-uni-directional vertical profiles, Any dicreet cell development often develops toward a more linear/bowing line segment/LEWP mode with time.

I will probably be chasing this setup and hoping for some discreet/semi-discreet action from southeast AL to the west central GA area.
 
Back
Top