They Gotta Stop Stealing Images
Hello,
I got the same email(s) aslo at my job way down here in Central Florida. Many people who were in my office were exclaiming how bad the "hurricane Katrina" pictures looked!!
I had to correct everyone of them that these were SUPERCELL pictures, and NOT HURRICANE pictures. All the people in my office did not know the difference between the two, except for a guy from Texas working with me!
The average viewer (lacking knowledge in storms and weather, ofcourse) will believe anything you show them that "LOOKS" extreme and violent in a unique way (example: dramatic supercell structure) and identify it with a disaster, like "hurricane Katrina" or "The storm that caused a plane crash".
I also understand that all these pictures involved were taken by Mike Hollingshead, who I know is a VERY respectable and regarded storm chaser and photographer of severe weather. His pictures are un mistakable and awe inspiring to say the least ... And highly un-fortunate for someone to "steal" for their own story.
This is another reason why we need to be so careful with our pictures as we post them. For example, always either watermark or caption your photos on the web ... Maybe instead of just putting "your name", put something like "your name - supercell near Girard, TX - 6/12/05" as a caption, this way no one can "lie" about it.
In more sense, I also limit the size of my pictures on my web site to only 320x240 and all are low-quality JPEG's. Here it does not matter if you use a label / caption or not since an image of such a low quality is still viewable but has no value to a magazine or TV proprietor wishing to falsify such an image!
I am sure we all remember the "Billy Griffith" scandal of June 2005?