• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Landspout or Gust Tornado ?

Thank you for your reports. Concerning the very particular case of this type of vortex and the set of presumptions that are now constituted, I was surprised for a long time that official weather organism such as the noaa were not interested more in this type of event. The explanation in the formation of this type of vortex seems moreover easy enough to explain finally and it is not very surprising that one can find at this precise site of a shelf cloud and in this type of conditions a whirlwind capable of touch the ground. It is neither a gustnado nor a landspout of cold air, nor a shear funnel. It is indeed a new class of tourbillon. In France we decided to call it a tornado of outflow front.

But after looking for a more suitable name and typing gustspout in google, (gustnado + landspout) I was pleasantly surprised to find that this type of vortex had been very recently studied and validated. Maybe I should contact this Matthew Cappucci.

https://ams.confex.com/ams/41BC2WxWarn/webprogram/Paper225816.html
 
@Damien49, the original and first photo you took looks like hybrid tornado (gustspout), like others have said. No offense, but I think you might have gotten that photo mixed with the one over water.

The one over water looks like a supercellular thunderstorm, with a very definite shelf cloud. Can you maybe give us the unedited photos over water because one of the photos looks like it has a clear slot in the background. I’m thinking low-topped supercell that is in the process of transitioning to a squall line. The supposed tornado over the water picture seems like there is no water being lifted, leading me to think that it is a beaver’s tail or tail cloud. You can almost see the faint HP characteristics.
 
Back
Top