Here we go again

[Mark Blue]

Another story about large network reporters live in the field during recent hurricanes.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weat...cessary/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a7c3f4c877f5

 

[Dan Robinson]

At least they didn't call out the chasers there. But If I was a betting man, I'd say that article is next.

At the very least, I'm thankful they have Ian Livingston on staff there who might be a tempering voice of reason.

 

[Jeff Duda]

At the very least, I'm thankful they have Ian Livingston on staff there who might be a tempering voice of reason.

What do you mean by that?

 

[Dan Robinson]

Ian is a chaser and a writer for the WP who has countered some of the anti-chaser sentiment in the past:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...its-often-misinformed/?utm_term=.b8fa655ebb6d

 

[Jeff Duda]

What anti-chaser sentiment are you referring to? The article in the OP presents both sides of this issue, and I did not detect any obvious or significant preachy vibe from the language in it.

 

[Dan Robinson]

I didn't see any in *this* article, thankfully, but the WP has lobbed a few at us in the past.