• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Does location affect forecast?

I'm not regionally biased in the least about tomorrow's probs...because the action is centered around my region! :P

Actually, I believe that there is a certain amount of regional bias to my TA posts...mostly because if I can't head in a particular direction, I probably won't forecast for it (unless it looks like a real doozy).

Tomorrow, though, I can honestly say that (IMO) the best chance of significant, chaseable tornadoes will be in N TX. Central Oklahoma is under a moderate, too, but I'd rather drive and see a tornado than sit at home and see a squall line.

Gabe
 
Originally posted by Aaron Kennedy

Would you drive to SD from OK for a marginal severe risk? I wouldn't.

If I thought there was a good chance to see tornadoes, of course. Done it before (and missed it all by 45 minutes.) Point being, when someone ignores an event only because they don't want to drive, that IMO isn't a chaser. If they don't think the set-up is worth the drive, that's a whole other ball of wax.
 
Originally posted by Bryce Stone
I think most everyone has missed the point of the discussion. See my last post above. Specifically, how does your regional bias affect (and should it affect) your forecast post in TA?

Doesn't affect them at all. I look for where the bst tornado potential will be, period. Whether or not it's close to me is of no consequence.

Why should anything effect a forecast other than observational data and models? You can focus on your area of choice if you're limited to or biased to a given spot, but that doesn't change the weather. I will never tell myself western OK looks better when I know S Nebraska is the place to be. You'd be a fool to do that IMO.

Example: Right now WC KS and N TX look better than anywhere in OK for tomorrow. Sad, but true.

Choosing the closer target is often times a decision made out of neccesity, but there's no reason to pretend that's the best place to be when it's really not. This is turning into psych 101 :lol:
 
Back
Top