Does it Cost $$$ To Join ST Now??

When we "support" ST, how about making the supporting accounts ad-free? At least google ad-free...
I pay $25 per year at JeepForum.com for an ad-free experience as well as access to a special area of discussion. Can ST do something like this?
Thoughts?
 
So basically those that are on the cusp of storm chasing but haven't, and those that have a passion for severe weather but either haven't had the time to go out and chase or haven't got around to do it should not be allowed here? A lot of good people come here to gain valuable knowledge from the experienced chases about all kinds of things.. which I figured to be a compliment.. and if it was you in charge, you'd want that to stop?

Not to mention that a large majority of the discussion topics and arguing points on this site would never exist if all of the new learners/non-chasers etc. weren't allowed here. Differing ideas and questions is what makes this site fun and interesting, keeping it from being bland and dry.

I could only imagine how exciting a forum like yours would be..

There's nothing wrong with experienced members of any given activity wanting to talk shop amongst themselves without having to turn everything said into a lesson for novice folk or non-chasers. To simply expect chasers to automatically make every second of their time/effort count towards education is rude and arrogant. Sometimes, people who are good at something just want to shoot the bull between their own kind, without the pressure and expectation of schooling everyone around them who doesn't understand every word they're saying.

How many of you have gone through the archives on the education section? There's enough knowledge that's been shared there to keep anyone too busy to be whining on this thread about elitism or other crap. The experienced members of this forum who've been here for years, from the very beginning, and who've made this forum what it is, have dealt a wealth of knowledge to this site. Instead of crying about being left out of the Big Boy discussions, why not go check it out for yourself if you feel you deserve to be here?

EDIT: Bring back the ST Core
 
More power to Tim Vasquez to do whatever the heck he wants to with Stormtrack.

IMHO he doesn't do as much as he could with monetizing the "brand". He could have gone the Metafilter route (which is also 100% user-generated content) and simply closed it to any new registrations for a good while and then opening them up for $5 each. This makes membership even more valuable (because you can't have one). While memberships were locked he could have auctioned a few off on eBay (just guessing that they would bring more than $5).

I really don't know why there is no "official" Stormtrack merchandise any more (or is there)? An eCommerce store for mugs, t-shirts, decals, license plate frames, etc. would probably generate a fair amount of change. (Go with Prestashops or Magento for the free eCommerce software).

Regarding having a decent server/internet connection - stormtrack is a .org domain. There would be no problem with an .edu hosting it and there are some who would probably welcome it for free - or banner considerations - (those with a decent meteorological program). I gotta believe that there are departments around the country that would give your server admin full access via ssh or something.
 
Not to mention that a large majority of the discussion topics and arguing points on this site would never exist if all of the new learners/non-chasers etc. weren't allowed here. Differing ideas and questions is what makes this site fun and interesting, keeping it from being bland and dry.

To be honest, I'd rather see less discussions and more quality.

FWIW... the NOW thread for today's event looks pretty clean for a change.
 
There's nothing wrong with experienced members of any given activity wanting to talk shop amongst themselves without having to turn everything said into a lesson for novice folk or non-chasers. To simply expect chasers to automatically make every second of their time/effort count towards education is rude and arrogant. Sometimes, people who are good at something just want to shoot the bull between their own kind, without the pressure and expectation of schooling everyone around them who doesn't understand every word they're saying.

How many of you have gone through the archives on the education section? There's enough knowledge that's been shared there to keep anyone too busy to be whining on this thread about elitism or other crap. The experienced members of this forum who've been here for years, from the very beginning, and who've made this forum what it is, have dealt a wealth of knowledge to this site. Instead of crying about being left out of the Big Boy discussions, why not go check it out for yourself if you feel you deserve to be here?

EDIT: Bring back the ST Core

I'm not crying. Crying would involve saying something along the lines of "I hate this site. I'm never coming back".

Some people don't get satisfaction or "feel goodiness" out of sharing the wealth of knowledge they possess. You may not be one of them, which is fine. But why become a killjoy for others? Everyone was a newb once, even you, believe it or not. I just don't see the need to squash that cycle.

No one forces anybody to read the "newbie" topics. No one forces anybody to succumb to the "pressures" and "expectations" of explaining things all the time. Or maybe they do and I'm just not aware..??
 
When we "support" ST, how about making the supporting accounts ad-free? At least google ad-free... I pay $25 per year at JeepForum.com for an ad-free experience as well as access to a special area of discussion. Can ST do something like this?
We will be keeping the ads. But if they bother you, just use Adblock and block them: http://adblock.mozdev.org/ We don't use any scripts here to force people to see them, and there's no stigma about blocking them as far as I'm concerned.

Tim
 
I don't see that shop talk among experienced chasers and simpler discussions that help new chasers get up to snuff are mutually exclusive. The beginners' and advanced categories exist to help separate the two, and every person has a choice whether or not to participate in a given thread.

However, after the cardioid fiasco, I agree that some criteria ought to be imposed for participation in the forum. It might involve a simple questionnaire to determine why a person wants to join, and where an applicant stands in the learning curve. Maybe a waiting period could be imposed for people who are so green that they can't participate fruitfully--give 'em a FAQ with links to basic self-education resources, require them to follow it, and let them follow the discussions as silent observers for a minimum of XX months, so they can see how different concepts play out in the various threads and familiarize themselves with the culture of Stormtrack.

I'm just tossing out some ideas; the details would obviously need to be hashed out. The point is, I don't see that Stormtrack needs to shut out new chasers in order to enhance the quality of discussions. I do, however, think that some tighter criteria would help.
 
Well.. I consider myself lucky I joined when there wasn't registration fee.. International users may be left without luck - at least I do not have a credit card, and I can only make monetary transactions only via usual bank and even that at best only within European Union. But well, if it helps to keep the forum afloat... Not very much complaining here.

P.S: I appreciate very much that I was grandfathered in. If I wasn't in Europe with no ability to make payments to U.S by other means than Western Union, I'd also have made a donation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FWIW, I've been a S.T. subscriber since it was literally a magazine that arrived in my mailbox bi-monthly. I got my first edition in '84 or '85. I still have every one of those issues, including the one where Dave Hoadley "passed the torch" to Tim Marshall. A few years after that, I vividly remember the long running, heated arguments amongst S.Trackers when Tim M. introduced the idea of eliminating S.T. as a hard-copy magazine and making it web-based. You think this little mini "feather-ruffling exercise" we're going thru right now in this thread has a few heated overtones...man, this is a skateboard compared to a Z-06 Vette! Seriously, S.T. almost didn't survive. IMO, thank God it did.
I believe that S.T. members would do well to realize that S.Track....the way we know it today...is indeed still a magazine. My guess is that most members today know it only as an online entity. This, in turn, might tend to skew member's perceptions into thinking that there is minimal time and money involved to produce this product. I submit that if we were all receiving a tangible, hard-copy magazine in our mailboxes, few would gripe at paying a reasonable subscription fee. Leafing thru a magazine in your hands makes one feel justified about paying a subscription fee, because you can see, smell and feel the embodiment of somebody's hard work. You lose that entirely by reading online.
I've never been invited to the "other" forum. Who knows, it might be an age thing (I'm 54...a lot of subscribers are a lot younger...and to a point, I understand.) And although I've been chasing for over 20 years, I've always quickly admitted that I'm not a meteorologist....and I've never once tried to bulls--t anybody that I am. Perhaps I've offended a few people (by calling them on what I've perceived is their bulls--t). But it's cool. I truly love S. Track, and wouldn't bail if given the chance. There are many, many intelligent, thought provoking guys and gals in here that I thoroughly look forward to hearing from..year in and year out. All in all....I think that StormTrack is a helluva lot of bang for my buck.
 
I don't know why anyone cares.. Simply put 5$ is nothing to pay for the amount of knowledge that can be gained from those on this site.

95% of you complaining on this thread did not have to pay the fine anyways, so stop whining.

I agree, if someone has a problem with a $5 fee to be a member then they probably dont belong here in the first place. Im sorry if that offends some of you out there, but $5 wont buy you a hamburger these days. If being a member of this board isnt worth the cost of a hamburger then what does that say?

Personally, i think its a good idea. Since i quit posting a while ago, it seems there has been an incredible influx of new users and new thread topics. Almost looks like a new board. All those features cost money im sure, and even if they are making more money then they are paying for server costs. Who cares, operating costs and profit margins are no ones buisiness but the owners. An honorable man would hope they do make a profit because ST does provides a valuable place to host your work. I dont know how anyone can expect someone to work for free all the time.
 
Remind me Tim V. how long does the Junior Membership tag last these days?
 
I'm a "newbie" to Stormtrack, but can (or may) I please say a few words about membership fees. I would hate to be kicked off of Stormtrack because I was "new". In the short time since I have joined (June 2009) I have learned so much more about weather, chasing and equipment then I ever learned in my spotter training classes. Following Stormtrack members comments on the forum before the storm, during the storm and after the storm has greatly increased my understanding of storms, especially when it was a storm that was nearby and I was also watching. In other words, I am willing to pay a membership fee to be a member of such a valuable forum.
 
No one is kicking anyone out and if you are already a member (as I understand it) you are free from charges. ONLY the people who sign up now (or maybe a couple days ago) would be subject. If someone (new or not) is willing to learn and follow a couple simple rules I see no tension or problems. It thumbs down to those who like to arm chair quarterback and nitpick from the sidelines where most problems arise. Welcome Lonnie and I am glad you chose Stormtrack as a learning asset because that's exactly what it is to most people.

BTW I am on board with Shane's comments RE: the core.
 
Back
Top