• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Has social media completely subverted the photography realm?

There used to be some value in having a social media following to direct some traffic to your web site, a (monetized) Youtube video or in the case of a photo, a link to a print ordering page, but now posts with external links are heavily penalized and seen by almost no one. It's a bait-and-switch, for all of that effort building a following you now only get the likes and shares on-platform. There's no give-and-take. It's all a one-sided deal in their favor now.

As long as everyone (including the best-of-the-best) keeps posting their prized work to these places, they have no incentive to implement monetization for all content. You have zero negotiating position right now if you want a cut of their earnings on your stuff. They just shrug their shoulders and say "you're already giving it to us for free and we get it all for free from everyone else, why would we change anything?". The Twitter/X monetization implemented only recently is basically an act of charity in comparison. To even qualify for it, you have to get an insane amount of viral traffic which means giving away a huge chunk of value to even have the *chance* of getting in.
 
There used to be some value in having a social media following to direct some traffic to your web site, a (monetized) Youtube video or in the case of a photo, a link to a print ordering page, but now posts with external links are heavily penalized and seen by almost no one. It's a bait-and-switch, for all of that effort building a following you now only get the likes and shares on-platform. There's no give-and-take. It's all a one-sided deal in their favor now.

As long as everyone (including the best-of-the-best) keeps posting their prized work to these places, they have no incentive to implement monetization for all content. You have zero negotiating position right now if you want a cut of their earnings on your stuff. They just shrug their shoulders and say "you're already giving it to us for free and we get it all for free from everyone else, why would we change anything?". The Twitter/X monetization implemented only recently is basically an act of charity in comparison. To even qualify for it, you have to get an insane amount of viral traffic which means giving away a huge chunk of value to even have the *chance* of getting in.

A column on Wired about a year and half ago coined a term for this that I think aptly describes the state of things.


The title refers specifically to TikTok, but it's equally applicable to what's happened with Failbook, TwitX, YouTube, and even non-social media sites such as Ebay and Amazon - basically all the platforms that became so big they basically became the Internet.
 
Back
Top