Jesse Risley
Staff member
For what it's worth there is an entire policy on this but it evidently does not apply here otherwise said content would be removed and verboten.The bigger question is when do social media outlets like YouTube and X stop allowing extreme video of such destruction, which only greenlights and encourages others to emulate the behavior? It seems like ever year the bar is raised to find more extreme antics for social media stardumb.
C.f., Harmful or dangerous content policy
The platforms seem to be most concerned with censoring videos that could cause imminent danger to viewers who emulate them, e.g., eating Tide pods or blowing things up with kitchen chemicals. There's a risk vs. reward with content that provides greater monetization, as some live streams and videos like this do. I suspect that, in their mind, this issue isn't one worth censoring since it's off the radar and not causing imminent harm to viewers hence it being allowed to stand. X seems to be taking an even more laissez-fair stance on censorship given that they are now allowing more robust adult content per an announcement earlier this week.