• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Avoiding getting caught in squall lines while chasing

Thank you very much, Tim, for such a thoughtful response, it reads in such a wonderfully technical way that I'm tempted to ask for citations from the literature! I recall encountering these concepts regarding LM/RM motion relative to surface boundaries in Bluestein's 2007 review article, though the original work was apparently Bluestein and Weisman (2000). Do you have a preferred reference spelling out the protocol for extracting the LM/RM vectors from radiosonde data? I can see how excessive linear convergence along a boundary could compromise isolated updrafts from taking root early on in initiation. As for the thermal gradient comment you make, is this because a strong thermal gradient across a boundary at the surface indicates the thermal wind vector (i.e. low-level wind shear vector) is most likely oriented parallel to the boundary, implying that LM modes will tend to propagate into stable air while RM mode will tend to congeal into a line? Just making sure I've got the right physical mechanism in mind.

As for progressive vs. serial lines, it definitely seems that a bunch of congealing discrete RM modes with loads of downstream CAPE and SRH (shear vector mostly parallel to boundary) would interact far more cooperatively/coherently than a bunch of colliding LM/RM modes (shear vector mostly normal to the boundary), all other environmental variables being equal. So your discussion of serial/progressive systems seems to make good sense.

I did encounter some amazing stratiform lightning in west OK the night of 5/18 this year, and you're right, the CC lightning seemed to go from horizon to horizon, plus tons of beautiful CG, with only modest rain obscuring the view.
 
Back
Top