• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

8/15/08 FCST: MO/IL/AR/IA

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael O'Keeffe
  • Start date Start date

Michael O'Keeffe

I started taking a look at the models again recently and noticed a bizarre closed low/unseasonably strong trough setting up in parts of E MO/IL/N AR/S IA on Friday, August 15. The 850s are backed from the MO/IA border all the way into NE AR with 40+ kts. common all up and down the region. The 500s are coming in around 50-80 kts. The problem seems to be the GFS showing temps only reaching the low 70s and dews reaching the low-mid 60s causing CAPE to barely exceed 1000 j/kg. I found this somewhat bizarre for mid-August, it looks more like an early spring type of event. This may need to be watched.
 
Have been watching this also, the euro however came in much further west on todays run however.. It will be interesting. Quite obviously a lot of dynamics but lacking the thermo profiles as of now.. Wow..
 
I haven't been watching the models for a couple days but after the TSA AFD mentioned this:

"THE NEXT CHANCE OF SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS WILL OCCUR
THURSDAY NIGHT AND INTO THE WEEKEND AS A MID-LEVEL LOW
CURRENTLY OVER WESTERN CANADA DROPS INTO THE CENTRAL UNITED
STATES. THE GFS IS LIKELY GETTING A LITTLE TOO CARRIED
AWAY THIS FEATURE AS IT CREATES A MOST IMPRESSIVE MID-LEVEL
LOW OVER MISSOURI BY SATURDAY. WOULD TEND TO BELIEVE THE
MORE CONSERVATIVE SOLUTION PROVIDED BY THE ECMWF. THE ECMWF IS
MUCH WEAKER AND FURTHER WEST OF THE GFS SOLUTION."

So I take a look at the models and then check here thinking there probably isn't any discussions yet. So, I am glad that at the very least others will share in my disappointment if this craziness doesn't happen. Just looking quickly through some of the models though it seems they are generally showing the same feature with the already mentioned timing and placement differences being the main issues.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The GFS just destroyed the setup in this morning's run, finally seeing sense and going with the WRF. No more surface low over Iowa can be seen and the 500mb low it predicted bursts quite quickly. It's worth it to check tonight's runs to see *just in case* but this morning's run falls more within reason for August.
 
Back
Top