Ramming actual surface conditions against the NAM/GFS/RUC progs for 06Z demonstrates two things:
1) The NAM, RUC, and GFS all have, currently, an excellent handle on the system;
2) Neither the GFS nor the NAM progged the current MCS precip mess very well, but the NAM may have the better handle on it due to the extra convecticrap it predicted for Iowa tonight (which will instead simply inherit the Nebraska mess if it survives sufficiently). The RUC seems dead-on, however.
What saith the RUC versus those two? From the 03Z RUC's 12-hour forecast, the corpse of the MCS will still have instability developing in its wake still, agreeing with the GFS scenario (which does not prog as heavy of a remains) - while the NAM's precip forecasting, similar in coverage to the RUC's, eliminates all instability for the affected areas in Iowa. This is of special note due to the further similarities between the RUC and the GFS with progged wind values in these areas throughout 850/500mb, a progression which, especially with the 500's, the NAM disagrees. The GFS and NAM further butt heads at 00Z over the much-maligned shear and turning - the GFS, note, has excellent speeds and some LL backing with height in Iowa (although I don't get what's up with the 700mb's) while the NAM doesn't provide as much backing in the lowest levels.
I am noting also that the RUC slows the system down a bit more than both the NAM and (especially) the GFS as far as its east-west progression of the low.
My targets are: (1) NC Kansas, (2) SC Nebraska; (3) Far W Iowa. with my (1) target as such (barely) because of the better potential
sans the precip remnants with respect to (2), and the fact that it could be uncontested as far as flow goes. But (2) is nearby, with (I think) lower LCLs predicted for the area. But the conditional (3) could be my actual play tomorrow if all the ingredients come around, due to the stronger shear and more than sufficient progged instability.
Definitely a day to watch carefully as we're heading out of DMX westbound down I-80.
Prediction for the SPC: 15 percent hail and wind over the obvious region; 30 percent wind for the four corners region into SC to C IA for the inevitable MCS; 5 percent area for tornadoes covering over the three areas above with 2 percent elsewhere, and a possible 10 percent upgrade when the best parameters are known during the day and especially if (3) turns out to verify.
Don't count out the GFS just yet, folks!
