Jeff Snyder
EF5
This post will address the S-of-I70 area, but the thread is valid for much of the central US...
The combination of strong instability and "interesting" wind profiles across the KS / OK / TX area tomorrow intrigues me. 00z/18 NAM forecast soundings valid tomorrow evening shows a fascinating (to me, at least) range of hodographs... In an "upslope" region across the northern TX panhandle, SW KS, and se CO, many of the hodographs are straight-line, but with most of the line displaced in the bottom half of the hodograph (not the typical top half), with 40-60 kt 0-6km shear (ok, "vector difference"). For example, see http://beta.wxcaster.com/cgi-bin/parse_skewt_trace_overlays.cgi?fcsthr=024&STATIONID=KDDC
A little farther south and east, forecast hodographs show more of a curved shear profile, with some respectable (by mid-June standards) "loopiness" across southwestern Oklahoma and western N TX. Though flow aloft is relatively weak, there is enough directional shear to still yield ~35kts 0-6km shear. For example, the hodograph at LAW is pretty nice: http://beta.wxcaster.com/cgi-bin/parse_skewt_trace_overlays.cgi?fcsthr=024&STATIONID=KLAW
Between the two areas, the NAM is showing some cyclonic curvature to the hodograph, which looks to favor left-splits / mesoanticyclones --> http://beta.wxcaster.com/cgi-bin/parse_skewt_trace_overlays.cgi?fcsthr=024&STATIONID=KGAG
All locations show strong instability (CAPE 2000-4000 j/kg) to support robust updrafts and little capping by 00z. It seems that the depth of moisture becomes more of an issue as one goes farther northwest from western Oklahoma, but no areas in the TX / OK / KS area seem to have much in the way of sources for UVV aloft. With the primary shortwave trough lifting well to the north, any related DPVA will also slide well north of the area. In addition, the GFS seems to keep the strong flow aloft farther north, with really marginal mid-level flow south of the OK / KS border (15-20 kts, compared to 30-35kts on the NAM). Finally, there may not be much in the way of substantial low-level convergence as winds veer behind the front.
The moderate to strong CAPE and sufficient deep-layer shear should yield a supercell threat across the southern and central Plains tomorrow. I'm not too hot on the lack of mid-level forcing (something which is shared with the 6/7/07 bustola in OK), and the questionable surface convergence may make it difficult to pin-down a target. But, given the time of year, I can't pass up a possible OK chase tomorrow. Personally, I think my decision on whether or not to chase will come down to the strength of the flow aloft tomorrow, which may well be the difference between multicell garbage and supercell love... If the GFS looks like it'll verify, I'll probably sit out; if the NAM looks like it'll verify, I'll probably make an effort to head out.
The combination of strong instability and "interesting" wind profiles across the KS / OK / TX area tomorrow intrigues me. 00z/18 NAM forecast soundings valid tomorrow evening shows a fascinating (to me, at least) range of hodographs... In an "upslope" region across the northern TX panhandle, SW KS, and se CO, many of the hodographs are straight-line, but with most of the line displaced in the bottom half of the hodograph (not the typical top half), with 40-60 kt 0-6km shear (ok, "vector difference"). For example, see http://beta.wxcaster.com/cgi-bin/parse_skewt_trace_overlays.cgi?fcsthr=024&STATIONID=KDDC
A little farther south and east, forecast hodographs show more of a curved shear profile, with some respectable (by mid-June standards) "loopiness" across southwestern Oklahoma and western N TX. Though flow aloft is relatively weak, there is enough directional shear to still yield ~35kts 0-6km shear. For example, the hodograph at LAW is pretty nice: http://beta.wxcaster.com/cgi-bin/parse_skewt_trace_overlays.cgi?fcsthr=024&STATIONID=KLAW
Between the two areas, the NAM is showing some cyclonic curvature to the hodograph, which looks to favor left-splits / mesoanticyclones --> http://beta.wxcaster.com/cgi-bin/parse_skewt_trace_overlays.cgi?fcsthr=024&STATIONID=KGAG
All locations show strong instability (CAPE 2000-4000 j/kg) to support robust updrafts and little capping by 00z. It seems that the depth of moisture becomes more of an issue as one goes farther northwest from western Oklahoma, but no areas in the TX / OK / KS area seem to have much in the way of sources for UVV aloft. With the primary shortwave trough lifting well to the north, any related DPVA will also slide well north of the area. In addition, the GFS seems to keep the strong flow aloft farther north, with really marginal mid-level flow south of the OK / KS border (15-20 kts, compared to 30-35kts on the NAM). Finally, there may not be much in the way of substantial low-level convergence as winds veer behind the front.
The moderate to strong CAPE and sufficient deep-layer shear should yield a supercell threat across the southern and central Plains tomorrow. I'm not too hot on the lack of mid-level forcing (something which is shared with the 6/7/07 bustola in OK), and the questionable surface convergence may make it difficult to pin-down a target. But, given the time of year, I can't pass up a possible OK chase tomorrow. Personally, I think my decision on whether or not to chase will come down to the strength of the flow aloft tomorrow, which may well be the difference between multicell garbage and supercell love... If the GFS looks like it'll verify, I'll probably sit out; if the NAM looks like it'll verify, I'll probably make an effort to head out.