John Sickels
EF2
As highlighted by SPC, possible large-scale outbreak of severe weather on Friday, May 30th, across a broad swath of the plains and Midwest.
After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.
I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.
For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.
From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.
Sincerely, Jeff D.
Looking at some samplings from the GFS forecast soundings (the one above being from Peoria at 00z), I'm not seeing much in the way of directional shear. So if that is how things pan out, the tornado threat may not be too great. But this is still a long way out. Lots can change.
But regardless of whether the tornado threat will be low or high, I do feel that severe weather will be widespread on Friday (and again on Saturday). There are lots of things to like about the setup as the GFS paints it.
1. Steep mid-level lapse rates
2. Very nice lifted indices
3. Strong deep layer shear
4. Good CAPE
5. Breakable cap
So again, with the cold front plowing into this very large area with favorable conditions in place, at the very least, you're likely to see a classic late Spring midwest squall line with a wide spread wind damage threat. Increase the directional shear just a little over what the models are currently forecasting and things could get very interesting.
Friday certainly is worth keeping an eye on. But that's about all I am willing to try to pin down at this moment because we know the models will probably flip-flop back and forth several times between now and then. But as of right this minute, based on the limited data I've seen, I would favor NE KS for the best area of tornadic potential. The Kansas City area is showing the best directional shear of any area within the broad outlook that I've seen, with very strong CAPE.
Well just a quick 00z Wed Model Run Update.
Actually having some trouble getting any 00z data, but from what I gather, I like what I can see..
NAM appears somewhat ominous showing 4000+ CAPE Developing by 00z Sat over SC IA and NC MO and some 3000+ Values into western IL.
Since I am not getting much data, I can't look deep into Hodo's but the best helicity is focused over the Jet Axis from Central MO into central IL and southwest into OK. Looks like CAPE/Shear could become more co-efficient this time..
I would expect some enhanced probabilities on SWODY 3 Tomorrow.
I guess I don't see what others see...because personally, I think it looks like hell, lol. Winds completely unidirectional...the only turning I see at all is the GFS solution...which brings 925mb and SFC both to the NORTHWEST, at a brisk 5kts at the surface
and not anywhere close to the area of best instability.
Unless there are some boundaries from previous storms in place, I don't expect much at all out of Friday's setup. Bow echoes for all, lol.
Despite all this, there still could be enough shear in place, or, like mentioned earlier, a favorable OFB or something, to have some discreet action before everything is swept away to freaking Maine. We'll have to see how the "sloppy seconds" unfold for Thursday's action, but whatever takes place, I'm gonna wager this to be a pretty difficult chasing setup.