• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

3/13/05 FCST: LA/MS/AL/WRN GA

Joined
Aug 28, 2004
Messages
674
Location
Sylacauga, Alabama
Looks like instability will build in the wake of a rather weak frontal boundary that will come into the region tomorrow. SRH values over 600 engulf NRN MS/AL by 20z. FCST SNDGS suggest that little CINH will allow initiation with a little forcing/uplift from the boundary and associated low pressure that should pass through the region. SPC Day 1 should have a SLGT...we will see. If moisture return is enough, torandic supercells can not be counted out via the WRF/meso-ETA.
 
Looks like it would be mostly elevated convection at least until evening. I do think that the northern Lousiana region could see some action with some supercells possible and severe hail.
 
I agree that northern LA may be the place to watch, falling in between moisture convergence just to the east, and thermal ridge just to the west. 6 Hr RUC model shows CAPE and Helicity may have EHI in the 2.0 to 2.5 range by late afternoon. Shreveport actual dewpoint up to 60 at 11 am.
 
...Next Several Hours (Through 3 PM CST)...
Looks like capping inversion will continue to erode from east to west across the area of concern per latest modified RUC analysis products. As a result we should see the cu fields continue to develop at a more advanced rate in a corridor from Central Mississippi or about 30 miles west of Tuscaloosa, AL into Northern Louisiana or about 25 miles south-southeast of Shreveport. Per RUC forecast of convective precipitation...it appears possible that several more hours of heating and persistent convergence could initiate a few rw/t across the area beginning primarily in West-Central Mississippi.

...Beyond (After 3 PM CST)...
As a weak vorticity maximum located over Western Texas continues to propogate eastward embedded in a subtropical jet stream drifting north look for vertical motions to begin to increase over a broader area. The timed arrival in the Louisiana and Mississippi region would be between 4 PM and 8 PM. During this timeframe it appears that any isolated activity would increase in coverage. With relatively high levels of vertical wind shear expected and a decent directional component to that shear...I would anticipate a large hail threat from any severe tstm. LCLs continue to rise over the past several hours and SPC mesoanalysis shows some low-level dry air being advected in from Northern Texas...which could be a product of large volumes of middle to upper tropospheric dry air traversing the area. As a result the tornado threat would appear to be relatively nominal but the backing of surface flow to a more southerly direction continues to enhance SRH/EHI values. Therefore...I suppose an isolated tornado touchdown would not be out of the question and the most likely location would be in close proximity to the low and front over NE LA into WC MS. Damaging winds should also be a threat with the svr tstms.

...Alex Lamers...
 
Thing are actually looking pretty good so far. The Shreveport WFO seems to be really discounting this whole thing but I think real-time observations are showing a little more moisture than they probably expected. If I was actually in Northern LA I would probably either wait for the convection that will form later in the afternoon or early evening with good cape and tons of helicity or go straight east in MS where it looks like the models are indicating the storms to start.
 
Back
Top