JamesCaruso
Staff member
It is very difficult to get a genuine "high risk" day without two factors, one of which will surprise some readers...
- Negatively tilted system. This was the case with April 27, 2011. With a closed low like we had last week? Almost no way.
- Convection in the morning. After having done a synoptic climatology of numerous (I think it was something like 50) F-4 and F-5 tornadoes, more than 90% occur with convection earlier in the day. There seems to be something about thunderstorms/reload/supercells that produces "the big ones." Of course, a major squall line with QLCS tornadoes occurred the morning of 4-27-11.
Interesting observation about “convection in the morning,” but, correlation not being causation, couldn’t convection in the morning just be a byproduct of the parameter space that is in place on a big day? On the bigger days, moisture is already in place the day before, then you have the approaching strong dynamics (and/or a lifting warm front) and you get morning convection. Then the atmosphere is worked over, so you need a lull if the instability is to be reloaded. With the more powerful systems, you have multiple short waves coming through, so you get more lift coming in at the right time later in the day. So the morning storms may have nothing to do with *producing* “the big ones“ - after all, morning convection has ruined many otherwise promising chase days. Instead, the parameters of a big day are simply more likely to produce morning convection?