• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2014-05-07 FCST: NE, IA, , MN, KS, OK, TX

CO

I think there is a pretty good play today in northeast CO. Bulk shear and instability look good behind the front, and despite cooler temperatures dpts. will be close. Strong low level shear and lifted condensation levels only a few thousand feet above ground level are favorable for tornado development.
 
Keeping an eye on the MN/IA border today as it's in my backyard. Shear isn't the best, but instability and lower LCLs up here will support a brief tornado threat if anything can actually break the cap. 11z HRRR had a good cell blowing up a few counties southwest of the Twin Cities. However, the trends on days like today is the early HRRR runs to blow convection off, which erodes away with subsequent runs.
 
. I do admire Skip, Francis and others that are going to look at it, though. Good luck to you all.

We actually abandonned our original Iowa target for today as we fear the hills and trees of MN and IA and that it seems to be mostly an after dark event. We are heading west as we speak on I-80 to play the western Nebraska targets, where CAPE is a lot less, but where moisture around Norht Platte around 00z should be a lot better. The helicity 0-1km seems ok and good 500mb & 700mb shear. The temperature and dewpoints in the 40s are somewhat concerning, but we'll give it a try and try to get in position for tomorrow also. Good luck today to anyone heading out, it's a tricky target. I like the wrap around moisture in Nebraska!
 
Francis, the terrain in southern MN, west of I-35 is actually pretty good. It's not until you are about 50 miles or less from the Twin Cities when it starts to get messy. HRRR is continually breaking storms out along the warm front near 23z this evening. Surprisingly, surface moisture is there in Iowa right now, and moving northward. I may actually head out of work a bit early, drive down there and see what happens.
 
Back
Top