Karen Politte
EF5
What confused many of us there at the time was that the entire large rain curtain zone *was* the tornado. That was only evident when that entire zone became the wedge after crossing 81. Everyone was focused on what was condensed, which was a major contributing factor to what happened.
It seems clear to me from the data that most of us who thought we were in inflow were in the tornado itself, if just the outer edge. I'm anxious to see the RaxPol data with timestamps which will prove or disprove this.
Dan posts what I think is one of the most astute observations on this tornado. I think I saw this most evidently from watching Jeff Piotrowski's video of the event (I believe he documented it from I-40 - regardless he was always north of the circulation). After the multivortex stage, when the tornado and parent circulation begin to "change" modes, and wrap the wet RFD around, you can see the violent motions in the wet RFD/atomized rain that the condensed part of the circulation is wrapping. It's like a fragmented debris-fan of cloud/precip around the tornado. I've never seen motion and structure like that in a tornado before - it was as if the condensed tornado funnel was just the "core" of the larger tornadic circulation it was embedded in - but the lack of condensation visible in the wider area of tornadic winds really seemed to be what caught a lot of folks off-guard.
In the end, what Dan mentioned about the difficulty in delineating between inflow/wet RFD and actual tornado is the crux of the matter. To do so on a tornado of this magnitude and varying size/shape is even more difficult, even without the insanely fast expansion and turning/acceleration of the circulation. What a horrible, horrible storm.
KP