• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2011 HotSpots

I never gave heat island too much credit, until I recently found out that there was a 2 degree F difference in average temperature between the metro area and Rochester to the south. Who knows how that factors in, but I think another factor is the glacial ridge.

4878176428_62f1f08888_b.jpg


Disclaimer - this is a rough composite I put together to show people what I'm working on. It's a map of tornado frequency by county, with topography overlaid. Maybe one day I'll build out my theory and have some real science behind it :D

You can see the glacial ridge (the white area) cutting a swath through the state. The periphery of the ridge seems to be a focus point for tornadic activity - and I started thinking about this when realizing that the metro area never has tornadoes, and the corridor between Wilmar and Alexandria always gets nailed. Even though the close proximity of KMPX, large number of Skywarn spotters, and well-populated area would lead you to believe the metro area would be statistically over-represented, it doesn't seem to skew the data.

Robert, that is a very interesting map you put together. We had a meteorologist at the NWS in Nashville, Dr Jerry Orchanian, who was a firm believer that topography played a major role in tornadogenesis, whether it be by orographic lifting, evapotranspiration, or even the albedo affecting the instability locally. I also think it would be interesting to play with your map just a bit more and compensate for the great difference in land areas for the counties, then compare the numbers to the terrain.
 
Looks like the 2011 Hotspot at the moment seems to be Iowa, multiple rounds of Severe Weather has seemed to track over the same area of that State so far this year. Think we might have to chalk off the Texas Panhandle for 2011 if the tracks of these troughs dont start making more of an approach from the deep SW
 
Back
Top