• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2/20/2005 Winter Storm: Midwest

Originally posted by rdale
I had a hard time believing those numbers (fortunately I made my snowfall map before they came out so I didn't talk about them much on-air ;> ) but in reviewing the Level II imagery there were some impressive bands going on for a while up that way.

- Rob

Yeah, I was watching those bands all afternoon. It does appear that some areas remained within heavy snow bands for quite some time, and as the old bands drifted off, new bands formed. I wouldn't quite say 14 or 15 inches, more like a 10-12 inch snowfall. Given the low snow to liquid ratio and compaction - If 15 inch amounts were actually realized, liquid equivalents would have likely exceeded 1.50 inches :shock:

This was a very good overrunning situation though... I did some isentropic analysis with the ETA 212 data, and the low level jet (850-700mb) intersected the pressure surfaces at a right angle, which is perfect. Lift was very impressive (omega's off very high)... Also of interest to me, was this system had a very strong TROWAL between 700-500mb, right over the area of heaviest snow - While this alone isn't impressive, when combined with very intense vertical motion, weak stability, and high moisture, historically leads to significant snowfall events. Within that region, theta-e cross sections showed the atmosphere to be convectively unstable, which was obviously realized...

Even though I didn't wind up with a ton of snow (6 inches), it was very interesting watching the situation pan out...
 
Back
Top