Would you like to see a photography section?

[John Gnuechtel]

Adding a photography sub-section smacks of feature creep to me. It's kinda like adding machine guns to the family station wagon. I mean, who wouldn't want machine guns? But once they're mounted, you realize they add weight and you aren't getting to work any faster </terrible analogy>

 

[Dennis Sherrod]

Edit: I forgot to say that I would like to add some Bob Ross photos, too. Can we have a section for Bob Ross photos because I love them.

Bob Ross and his happy machine guns.

 

[Melanie Kern-Favilla]

Oh my God that is the most disturbing thing I've ever seen.

Sacrilege!

 

[Jim Saueressig]

I forgot, what are we arguing about again?

The exact date of the first EF4 next February!

 

[Heidi Farrar]

That makes me very happy Dennis. Thank you.

 

[Mark Farnik]

Dennis, where did you get that awesome Bob Ross photo? I want it for my avatar!!!

Edit - never mind, I forgot that you just click on the photo and then save it. Heh heh goodbye 'A Road to Nowhere', hello 'The Joy of Machine Guns!'

Edit 2 - Done!

 

[Dennis Sherrod]

It's yours Mark. Go for it. Good ole Happy Bob.

 

[Chris Allington]

So, we can have 5 threads in the beginner section saying... "hello" but not a photography sub-forum to keep all of the technical questions and other photo threats from cluttering B&G?

Maybe we also need a, 'First time posting so the lurker deletion thing doesn't happen to me thread.'

 

[Tyler Burg]

I think its a great Idea, we already have a lot of threads in B&G that are photography related...Even if there was a section "atmospheric photography" as most of the photography in the B&G have to do with weather or astronomy. I won't mind either way, cause its not like people aren't going to post photos just because there isnt a section dedicated just for photography.

I can understand those that want to keep it strictly a storm forum, if that is the case though, you need to except the fact that it is going to be dead during the winter.