• While Stormtrack has discontinued its hosting of SpotterNetwork support on the forums, keep in mind that support for SpotterNetwork issues is available by emailing [email protected].

Weather Conference 2020

Steve Miller

Owner Emeritus
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2004
Messages
1,787
Location
Moore, OK
Anonymous Stormtrack member post:

The following is a quick survey to gain interest in the establishment of a fresh new conference concept surrounding all aspects of weather but from an enthusiasts point of view. The conference would occur on February 21-23 in Oklahoma City, OK. Storm chasing and spotting are heavily supported and that's why we're approaching Stormtrack.org membership to garner interest. Naturally, we're remaining anonymous in the near-term as we explore the potential and "Weather Conference 2020" is just a placeholder name. If you believe you'd like to participate and/or learn more, please follow this link Weather Convention 2020 - if you think your friends or fans would be interested in attending, please consider passing this link along.

Regarding this post, on a personal note, I can vouch for the potential of this ask and that's why I'm posting it. If you have questions, just stick them in this thread.
 
Thinking a new conference with new ideas/organization and way of doing things is just what we need. I know I won't be at another chasercon, but would attend something with new ideas, breakout sessions, etc.
 
I have no idea if I would be able to attend it, but if I'm available I would be interested in attending. If nothing else to hopefully network and put some faces and conversations with the names I see here on the forum. And I'm sure I would learn something along the way.
 
If the price is right I'd be open to it. Biggest reason I didn't go to Chasercon this year despite it being much more accessible for me than Denver in Wichita was the steep cost.
 
I guess I have a hard time seeing what this new conference would offer that existing ones don't. There are already tons of regional storm chaser/severe storm conferences, both on the academic/research side and on the chasing/logistical side. So what's different about this one? Need more details to give much of an answer.
 
I guess I have a hard time seeing what this new conference would offer that existing ones don't. There are already tons of regional storm chaser/severe storm conferences, both on the academic/research side and on the chasing/logistical side. So what's different about this one? Need more details to give much of an answer.
This event would be for all types of weather, not just storm chasing. Think tropical, winter, even volcanic events and more. The approach would be more of a breakout style as well; attendees can pick and choose what they want to learn at the event, and at what level in some cases, so no one feels left out. It’s more of an all-encompassing, freestyle approach that’s not meant to take away from any of the other conferences.
 
The proposed scheduling seems awfully close to when Chasercon is normally held. I hope that if this conference moves forward it will be scheduled at a different time of year. Otherwise, both conferences will cut into each other's attendance and neither will be as successful.
 
Not sure who has already heard, but as I understand it, there are some questions regarding continuing Chasercon via Roger and Karen (at least what has been posted on social - please correct me if I misunderstood?)

That said, I totally agree with @Shane Adams and @Ben Holcomb...would be nice to have a fresh start if you will most particularly if the Hills indeed decide to kill Chasercon.

I was actually just thinking the other day about calling @Steve Miller to see if he could “work his magic” and garner some type of interest on this topic.

That said,
IMO, it would be very nice to something a little different than the usual Chasercon type event. What I mean is - maybe something like what Chasercon was back in the early 2000s? I would def. be interested!
 
I would definitely be interested. I know there are other conferences out there, but my impression (I could be wrong) is that - except for Chasercon - the bigger ones are more academic and geared toward professional meteorologists, while the smaller/regional ones for enthusiasts, especially the single-day events, just aren’t worth traveling by plane for. I like the idea of including other types of weather, but having breakout sessions so you can choose your own track for what interests you.

I have only been to Chasercon twice, but the whole thing recently about seeking subsidy on GoFundMe was a turn-off to me, it’s a for-profit venture, raise the price if it’s not profitable, why am I going to subsidize it to keep the price down for everybody else? It also irked me that it was always on a weekend near Valentine’s Day, kind of tough to leave my wife at home to go on my own personal boondoggle for that particular weekend.

But if Chasercon is going to continue, I agree with @John Farley it would be foolish to have this new thing so close to Chasercon on the calendar. If Chasercon were to continue, I would schedule this new conference in the fall. In the winter, an east coast snowstorm could easily disrupt travel plans. And this way it separates the conferences by a number of months. Also I don’t like the idea of scheduling it on Presidents Day weekend; it’s a lot easier for me to get away and do my own thing on a “normal” weekend as opposed to a holiday one where potential family events/trips take priority; I have to assume others with family responsibilities feel the same way. Unless you want it to just be a conference for college students and people in their early 20s.

Having said all this, of course I can’t commit to actually attending in a given year, it depends on budget etc. Also depends on what’s going on at work, if I have enough vacation time, etc. In general, February is a bad time for me to be away, I’m a CPA and the first quarter is a very busy time of year. But that’s just me.
 
I think I would need more information to be able to say “yes” or “no” to being interested. As others have alluded to, their are a lot of conferences out there. It would have to stand out fairly significantly in order for me to attend, especially given I do not attend the others
 
Regarding the Chasercon GoFundMe page, I am pretty sure that was started by some attendees who wanted to help fund the conference, not by the conference organizers. They have always done what James suggested, i.e. charge enough to cover the costs. There have been some discussions about ways to make the conference funding more reliable if indeed it continues, since an instance a couple years where the required number of people did not stay in the hotel, although I think that situation was eventually resolved without out-of-pocket losses for the organizers. But the underlying problem of conference organizers being at risk if the conference loses money is a potential problem for any conference organized by individuals rather than by an organization. The same thing would be true of the new conference if it is organized by individuals.
 
Bottom line, for any conference in the future to be successful, the organizers will have to realize that it needs to be convenient for the ATTENDEES, not the organizers. IMO the biggest issue with Chasercon was, at the end of the day, it was 99.9% geared towards the convenience of the organizers and not the attendees....who, for several years, pleaded for changes. It also didn't help that the organizers basically separated themselves from the community at large over the past several years, then complained and (more or less) begged for help increasing attendance. If you're going to be successful in keeping folks interested, #1 - WALK AMONG THEM.

Moving it around was a great idea, but it's always gonna be tied to Denver. That's great, but IMO "the" conference of stormchasing needs to be in a more traditional stormchasing beacon, like Oklahoma City (the tornado capital of the world).
 
Back
Top