JamesCaruso
Staff member
It’s not clear to me exactly what changed in the 24 hours since Warren mentioned “the possible demise of the bill on the horizon”??
Perhaps an easy and quick way for an OK resident to start a real opposition campaign like I suggested above in post #374 would be to open a crowd-funding account on GoFundMe or similar safe platform, to solicit funds to hire a lobbyist to fight our (out-of-state) opposition cause (from within OK). If this would attract, say 100 people at twenty-bucks apiece, two-grand could be raised quickly for this purpose. Of course, the person(s) doing this would first need to get all the facts, numbers, and details about how to go about this from the Oklahoma NASL or OKSPA (see post #349) to determine if this approach is even doable for the funds that likely could be raised in the time still left before a final vote is taken.I think the problem is that most of us here do not live in Oklahoma. I think, as others have said, that legislators do not care about the opinions of people from out of state. For that matter, they probably do not care about opinions from Oklahomans who do not live in their districts. So if you live in Oklahoma, by all means raise as much hell over this as you can with your legislators. But if you do not live there, I am not sure there is a whole lot that you can do. I made some comments on one of the sponsors' FB page, and got a lot of likes and several supportive comments, but I doubt he cares unless he knows I live in OK, which I do not.
Any evidence that Ryan Hall has taken a stand on this bill? I found nothing on his FB or Twitter pages. His Youtube page says he has 2.46 *million* subscribers. Divide by 50 and that's nearly 50,000 in OK. If he said the word, they'd blow up the Legislature's switchboard.
Anyone leaning on *him*?
As soon as we see confirmation of some more movement of the bill through the legislative committees (or wherever it is now in their process), I'm confident this tread will "light up" a bit more. What surprises me is that the people who post on this thread are generally the same one who are following the NOAA firings. Why aren't more of ST's total membership interested in these two issues, especially considering that they both could affect everyone interested in storm chasing who posts here and elsewhere on social media? For ST members who are "our eyes and ears on the Oklahoma legislature," please continue to keep us updated on the latest developments (despite the ENH risk in your area today!)...RE: Ryan Hall, this is my problem. Guys like him could easily set the chase community and OK viewership on fire, but he doesn't. He does not take the time to see the greatest dangers are a lot more complex than worrying about his viewership. I guess he does not care if the bill passes, ignoring that it will spawn similar legislation in other states. This is why I'm sick of fighting it. I have zero skin in the game other than the few times I chase in OK in mostly NOT FOR PROFIT scenarios. I'll have zero respect for him in the future if he does not step up the plate and become a lot more aggressive. He may have the most to lose of any chaser / live broadcaster.
I should also point out that the NOAA employment terminations are taking a lot of the air and bandwidth out of this fight.
My cynical (realist) opinion is that it will be clandestinly passed. Perhaps by being attached/amended to another bill that is almost guaranteed passage.SB158 is slated to go before the Senate Appropriations Committee next. They meet tomorrow at 1:30PM CST, but as of just now, no agenda has been posted for the meeting, so we don't know if SB158 will be heard in Appropriations, nor do we know what what the latest version in the Senate will look like.
In the Oklahoma House, Fetgatter's HB2426 has been referred to the Commerce and Economic Development Oversight Committee, which meets at 10:30AM CST today. HB2426 is not on the agenda for that committee as of 10:15AM CST.
Not sure what's up but do not assume anything is dead until the Legislature adjourns in May.
Sorry. Call me a cynic. I certainly am that.
Curiously, Oklahoma has a clause in its constitution that prevents riders or omnibus bills—“one bill one subject”. To compensate for this nonsense, they replace bills in toto: a dog catcher bill suddenly transforms into a concealed carry bill on the floor (to give an extreme and fictitious example.)My cynical (realist) opinion is that it will be clandestinly passed. Perhaps by being attached/amended to another bill that is almost guaranteed passage.