• Stormtrack's forum runs on Xenforo forum software, which will be undergoing a major update the evening of Wednesday, Feb 28th. The site may be down for a period while that update takes place.

NWS HOTSEAT (V0.02) 2 Inproved Scenarios.

MatthewCarman

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ffc/HotSeat/hotseatstart.shtml


SVR's

Issued:17
Verrified:1
Lead Time:1 minute
Missed:3

TOR's
Issued:20
Verrified:9
Lead Time:11 minutes
Missed:0

POD: 76%
FAR: 72%
CSI: 25%

Score: 281000

This is so much fun I want to keep trying it over and over again. Be sure to try the first scenario before the others.
 
I did poorly on the Alabama scenario, as I wasn't sure how the coverage area for the warning "boxes" worked. Once I figured it out, though, I took a stab at the Iowa scenario. My numbers...

SVR

Issued: 11
Verified: 4
Lead Time: 9 minutes
Missed: 0

TOR

Issued: 14
Verified: 11
Lead Time: 8 minutes
Missed: 0


POD: 100%
FAR: 40%
CSI: 60%
 
I did the Iowa and Southeast Tropical Depression Scenarios. I thought I did fairly well on the Iowa one:

SVR's
Issued: 4
Verified: 2
Lead Time: 8 Minutes
Missed: 1

TOR's
Issued: 10
Verified: 6
Lead Time: 6 minutes
Missed: 2

POD: 72%
FAR: 42%
CSI: 47%

I failed big time on the southeast TD scenario, nevertheless it was a great way to kill time.
 
I did the Alabama Scenario..

SVRs:

Issued: 24
Verified: 8
Lead Time: 3
Missed: 5

TORs:

Issued: 8
Verified: 3
Lead Time: 2
Missed: 0

POD: 68%
FAR: 65%
CSI: 29%

Score: 286450
 
I went back and tried the TD scenario...

SVR

Issued: 14
Verified: 4
Lead Time: 5 minutes
Missed: 2

TOR

Issued: 15
Verified: 10
Lead Time: 10 minutes
Missed: 0

POD: 87%
FAR: 51%
CSI: 45%

Tough scenario... I expected worse numbers.
 
I did the new Iowa scenario:

score: 543550

SVR's

Issued: 9
Verified: 3
Lead Time: 15 min
Missed: 0

TOR's

Issued: 12
Verified: 10
Lead Time: 7 min
Missed: 0

POD 100%
FAR 38%
CSI 61%

Not too shabby...
 
Back
Top