David Brookshier
EF2
I don't know if he is telling the truth or not I have just a couple of red flags that make this photograph hard for me to see as real.
1> This cloud to ground lightning strike is reporteldy a positive flash which are far more powerful around ten times the strength of negative charged CGs. They are extremely rare and if he were truly that close to one I'm surprised none of the branching current ground arced into him.
2> More importantly how can anyone capture a lighting strike at this range with a camra mounted on the back of a bumper and not have serious camra shake from the resulting shock wave. The shock wave from a positive flash would be even more powerful and that to me makes this even more unconvincing. How can you not get camra shake from a CG ten times the standard strength of thier negative counterparts especially at the range shown in the photograph and mounted on a car of all things, I don't buy it.
1> This cloud to ground lightning strike is reporteldy a positive flash which are far more powerful around ten times the strength of negative charged CGs. They are extremely rare and if he were truly that close to one I'm surprised none of the branching current ground arced into him.
2> More importantly how can anyone capture a lighting strike at this range with a camra mounted on the back of a bumper and not have serious camra shake from the resulting shock wave. The shock wave from a positive flash would be even more powerful and that to me makes this even more unconvincing. How can you not get camra shake from a CG ten times the standard strength of thier negative counterparts especially at the range shown in the photograph and mounted on a car of all things, I don't buy it.