• While Stormtrack has discontinued its hosting of SpotterNetwork support on the forums, keep in mind that support for SpotterNetwork issues is available by emailing [email protected].

Houston weather company predicts fewer hurricanes this year

Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
68
Location
Houston, Texas
Houston weather company predicts fewer hurricanes this year

The Weather Research Center in Houston doesn't think this will be an active hurricane season.

Meteorologist Jill Hasling predicts only eight tropical storms will form this summer, less than half the number of storms forecast by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

But that's only part of the WRC forecast. "The main purpose is to indicate which section of the U.S. coast has the highest risk of landfall," Hasling told me. And according to her, Florida has the best chance of being hit by a tropical storm or hurricane this year. There's also a greater chance of a storm hitting Texas than the East Coast of the U.S.

Sunspot from NASAThe WRC forecast is unique and not just because it predicts a "below average season" and where a hurricane could make landfall. Hasling and her late father, John C. Freeman for whom Houston's Weather Museum is named, developed the Orbital Cyclone Strike Index which matches the circulation pattern on the sun with weather patterns on Earth.

"In our research we found that there are patterns of movement in these large scale patterns that can be sorted into an index and used to make an outlook for the season," says Hasling.

The sunspot cycle was in a similar phase in 1925 and only one hurricane formed that year. The last time we were in this phase of the cycle was 1998 and 13 tropical cyclones formed. During other analog years fewer storms formed, but the average is eight.

"The OCSI is 88.5% accurate," Hasling claims. "More accurate than Professor Gray's model" used by Colorado State University which predicts this hurricane season will be very active.

Let's hope the WRC forecast is correct.


Link..http://weatherblog.abc13.com/
 
The sunspot cycle was in a similar phase in 1925 and only one hurricane formed that year.

To go back and use years like 1925 is pretty foolish IMHO. Only one RECORDED storm formed that year but back in those times many fish storms went unreported since there was not a way to detect them other than getting reports from mariners that would get caught in them. In actuality I bet there were more than one tropical cyclones in the Atlantic that year.
 
To go back and use years like 1925 is pretty foolish IMHO. Only one RECORDED storm formed that year but back in those times many fish storms went unreported since there was not a way to detect them other than getting reports from mariners that would get caught in them. In actuality I bet there were more than one tropical cyclones in the Atlantic that year.

The main issue I have with their forecast is they appear to be ignoring some other fairly important factors in predicting Atlantic Basin hurricane activity. Were the SST's running above normal in 1925? Were waters cooling in the Pacific as that season started? So on and so forth.
 
The main issue I have with their forecast is they appear to be ignoring some other fairly important factors in predicting Atlantic Basin hurricane activity. Were the SST's running above normal in 1925? Were waters cooling in the Pacific as that season started? So on and so forth.
I don't believe we really know as I'm pretty sure we didn't have buoys back then. Really we didn't know about them until they either impacted land or a ship. SST's and conditions outs at sea were not observable in the 20's It wasn't until after WWII that we started to do more to forecast and tack the storms through technological advances. Even then it wasn't a few more decades that we started to get any real climatological data for locations out at sea. Like I said you can't base much of anything off storms that happened that long ago.
 
I don't believe we really know as I'm pretty sure we didn't have buoys back then. Really we didn't know about them until they either impacted land or a ship. SST's and conditions outs at sea were not observable in the 20's It wasn't until after WWII that we started to do more to forecast and tack the storms through technological advances. Even then it wasn't a few more decades that we started to get any real climatological data for locations out at sea. Like I said you can't base much of anything off storms that happened that long ago.


Yea I was already aware of this for I was just emphasizing my point of how you can't go all the way back to 1925 and use it as an 'analog' year based exclusively on sunspot activity without considering other factors as well. I started to mention other factors we use today that weren't used in 1925 as well.
 
Back
Top