• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Glaciers disappearing from Kilimanjaro

Why do these articles always call Kilimanjaro's glaciers "world renowned"? They are small, slow moving, and dirty from lack of precip. Many(most?) other famous mountain ranges have glaciers that are much larger, get far more precip, and are steeper and faster moving, therefore containing all manners of awesome gaping crevasses.


Because Hemingway wrote a book that mentions them? Or because these glaciers are so small that they are close to dissipation, better fitting the agendas of many of these writers?
 
I also rode to work today on a unicorn.

http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/1016476466000205357mdBkSoxGDM

Believe me this link is relevant--it's all about what constitutes evidence. :)

Well I'll be! I didn't know unicorns were real! I'm just an Arkansas hillbilly, don't travel much... I hunt a lot, but I've never seen one around here. Where can I find those? I'd sure shoot one if I seen it... can you eat those??? :D

There are shirts with Obama riding a unicorn. I see paintings of Obama naked riding unicorns.... I can't tell if it is Obama supporters or Obama critics promoting that stuff. Beck on Fox, interviewing Jonah Goldberg, where Goldberg says,

" And let me be clear: I don't think this debunks the whole idea of global warming (talking about climategate). But what it does debunk is that there are these pure, gifted, wonderful scientists, riding around on unicorns just trying to stay the divine truth, you know?"

So I guess saying "scientist, riding around on unicorns" would be implying they poses almost magical abilities and have totally moral objectives. I'm assuming the "Obama on a unicorn" shirts and paintings are a joke then? Just a country boy here... first time I have been confronted with the idea of unicorns, riding unicorns, and the like.
 
Here's an interesting Kilimanjaro article I ran across while researching what unicorns had to do with global warming. Oh by the way... my conclusion: They fart methane just like cows.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/dutch-gore-wrong-on-snows-of-kilimanjaro/

... which includes a link to a "highly technical" article published in the journal Nature. It is technical I suppose, but very short:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7273/abs/nature08520.html

Professor Jaap Sinninghe Damste — a leading molecular paleontologist at Utrecht University, has found that Kilimanjaro's ice cap is formed during periods of greater precipitation and that the disappearance of the ice cap now occuring is due to a recent period of lower precipitation. He has concluded that Kilimanjaro has been ice free in the past following a previous dry period and may be ice free again in the future, due to intirely natural causes.

I'm no molecular scientist, but seems to be just as science based as other studies. He has supposedly studied 25,000 years worth of sediment layers at the base of the mountain to identify periods of greater precipitation. I reckon these periods of greater precipatation could be due to climate change (ha)...

Regarding the use of word "expert" in my previous posts. When I think "expert" I think of the guy... or gal... with the know-it-all attitude...ask them a probing question and they come back with, "what... you dare to question ME?"

I love science... LOVE it. Scientist welcome questions, look at ALL the data, welcome every plausable explanation. Scientist admit when they don't know something, when they are wrong, and when they don't know enough to say for sure. Science of late has suffered damage because of the "experts".
 
Tell it like it is!

Tell it like it is Joshua! Tell it like it is!

Here's an interesting Kilimanjaro article I ran across while researching what unicorns had to do with global warming. Oh by the way... my conclusion: They fart methane just like cows.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/dutch-gore-wrong-on-snows-of-kilimanjaro/

... which includes a link to a "highly technical" article published in the journal Nature. It is technical I suppose, but very short:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7273/abs/nature08520.html

Professor Jaap Sinninghe Damste — a leading molecular paleontologist at Utrecht University, has found that Kilimanjaro's ice cap is formed during periods of greater precipitation and that the disappearance of the ice cap now occuring is due to a recent period of lower precipitation. He has concluded that Kilimanjaro has been ice free in the past following a previous dry period and may be ice free again in the future, due to intirely natural causes.

I'm no molecular scientist, but seems to be just as science based as other studies. He has supposedly studied 25,000 years worth of sediment layers at the base of the mountain to identify periods of greater precipitation. I reckon these periods of greater precipatation could be due to climate change (ha)...

Regarding the use of word "expert" in my previous posts. When I think "expert" I think of the guy... or gal... with the know-it-all attitude...ask them a probing question and they come back with, "what... you dare to question ME?"

I love science... LOVE it. Scientist welcome questions, look at ALL the data, welcome every plausable explanation. Scientist admit when they don't know something, when they are wrong, and when they don't know enough to say for sure. Science of late has suffered damage because of the "experts".
 
Back
Top