Derek Weston
EF5
Glad to hear he was caught. Guys like this need to be locked up and kept away from any public matters. 5-10 in a stern Texas correctional facility will do'em good.
-
After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.
I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.
For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.
From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.
Sincerely, Jeff D.
False Spotter Network Reports - May 26, 2009
- Thread starter David Reimer
- Start date
Will Wilkens
It's got to be Alberto.
Joey Ketcham
I think it is bad to abuse Spotter Network and anyone who does should and needs to be banned from using it, but I don't think I would go as far as saying he needs to be locked up in prison for it. That's a bit extreme. I can see it now...
Bubba: I sliced a man's neck open and watched him choke on his own blood and die. What are you in for?
Joe: I made some false reports on Spotter Network
Tyler Allison
EF5
It's not Alberto, this guy was in Midland, TX the entire time. It would take a bit of leg work, but any reputable law enforcement agency could find the person and arrest him/her if they wanted to. People think the Internet is anonymous...it isn't.
Sending in false reports to the NWS is like calling 911 and saying a bank is being robbed when it really isn't. You can argue about how bad that crime really is, but it's still a crime. (or so I'm told)
Sending in false reports to the NWS is like calling 911 and saying a bank is being robbed when it really isn't. You can argue about how bad that crime really is, but it's still a crime. (or so I'm told)
Tyler Allison
EF5
If the NWS office turns one of them into an LSR, yes. But not automatically. No reports to the NWS are automatically made an LSR be it from the phone, email or the SN.
Marcus Hicks
EF2
I just don't get why people do stuff like this. Glad you got him banned Tyler
Kevin Cramer
EF0
Just a thought on how it might be possible to stop this kind of stuff before it happens, and I don't know if it would be possible with your backend or not, but you could make an algorithm that figures out the distance between two reports, and the time between two reports, and if it is over some determined value, throw the report out as it would be impossible to have made the trip in that time. All it would be is an extra PHP/Perl/Whatever-you-are-using call and it would be able to stop these kind of reports early on. I don't know if you have already talked about doing something like that, but it might be worth it.
I'll be happy for when you have to have the SN test passed to make reports. All reports should be reasonable good at that point.
Tyler: Fine job with nabbing this persons info. You should release the IP to ST and let the hounds loose. I'm not sure I have ever seen a better sleuthing group than those on this forum...
Tyler: Fine job with nabbing this persons info. You should release the IP to ST and let the hounds loose. I'm not sure I have ever seen a better sleuthing group than those on this forum...
Ryan McGinnis
EF5
Steve -- releasing an IP to a forum to "let the hounds loose" is a good way to get Tyler and Tim Vasquez sued.
I think last time SN had a joker filing lots of false reports the FBI got involved. They're pretty good at finding people.
I think last time SN had a joker filing lots of false reports the FBI got involved. They're pretty good at finding people.
Darren Addy
EF5
Before a lynch mob forms, there is a degree of uncertainty whether the person at the keyboard was actually the guy behind the username (Kyle Guthrie). For example, he could have left his computer without logging out of the spotternetwork and somebody else sat down at the computer and started to have fun posting as that user. (Chances are that would be a friend or acquaintance, given the time of day, so he should still be questioned, IMHO).
Does the spotternetwork.org site have a cookie that is placed upon log-in? If so, you might consider giving it a shorter expiration time so that this becomes less likely. I think most people would not mind being required to log-in again more often, if it helped prevent this sort of oversight (if that is what it was). It seems unlikely to me that someone with his experience would do this, particularly under his own username. I think there is plenty of reason to consider him innocent until proven guilty (besides that being the way our justice system should work).
However, there is quite a bit of publicly available information on Kyle Guthrie, stormchaser starting with:
http://www.flickr.com/people/kyleguthriestormchaser/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kyleguthriestormchaser/
The email address at the bottom of the contact page matches the username of these posts:
http://community.myfoxwausau.com/blogs/kgut973/2007/06/20/Storm_Chasing_In_North_Texas
which associate him with a "Tarrant County Storm Chase Interceptor Team".
http://community.myfoxspringfield.com/photos/default.aspx?un=kgut973
Also, this page associates his chasing with another name (bottom of page).
http://www.livestream.com/stormchasing
as does this YouTube page:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s7Xng8HXyI
His YouTube profile page:
http://www.youtube.com/user/stormchaser21
This video associates him with a third name:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRyBwnR0hOs
I guess I find it interesting (under the circumstances) that the username picture seems to be of Kyle Guthrie (based upon Flickr profile info) but the YouTube video is TAGS are Michaela Vallejo
He gives his home town as "Dallas/Ft. Worth", "Bedford", or Burkburnett, or "Wichita Falls area". Since these cover different dates, moving around is indicated.
Also: http://www.weathermatrix.net/members/public.php3?f=Kyle&l=Guthrie
Does the spotternetwork.org site have a cookie that is placed upon log-in? If so, you might consider giving it a shorter expiration time so that this becomes less likely. I think most people would not mind being required to log-in again more often, if it helped prevent this sort of oversight (if that is what it was). It seems unlikely to me that someone with his experience would do this, particularly under his own username. I think there is plenty of reason to consider him innocent until proven guilty (besides that being the way our justice system should work).
However, there is quite a bit of publicly available information on Kyle Guthrie, stormchaser starting with:
http://www.flickr.com/people/kyleguthriestormchaser/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kyleguthriestormchaser/
The email address at the bottom of the contact page matches the username of these posts:
http://community.myfoxwausau.com/blogs/kgut973/2007/06/20/Storm_Chasing_In_North_Texas
which associate him with a "Tarrant County Storm Chase Interceptor Team".
http://community.myfoxspringfield.com/photos/default.aspx?un=kgut973
Also, this page associates his chasing with another name (bottom of page).
http://www.livestream.com/stormchasing
as does this YouTube page:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s7Xng8HXyI
His YouTube profile page:
http://www.youtube.com/user/stormchaser21
This video associates him with a third name:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRyBwnR0hOs
I guess I find it interesting (under the circumstances) that the username picture seems to be of Kyle Guthrie (based upon Flickr profile info) but the YouTube video is TAGS are Michaela Vallejo
He gives his home town as "Dallas/Ft. Worth", "Bedford", or Burkburnett, or "Wichita Falls area". Since these cover different dates, moving around is indicated.
Also: http://www.weathermatrix.net/members/public.php3?f=Kyle&l=Guthrie
Last edited by a moderator:
Joey Ketcham
What Darren said.
Looking at his pictures and videos he seems to be a legit storm chaser, I agree in that we shouldn't be so quick to assume. There could be any number of reasons for why there were so many reports from him.
Looking at his pictures and videos he seems to be a legit storm chaser, I agree in that we shouldn't be so quick to assume. There could be any number of reasons for why there were so many reports from him.
Dennis Sherrod
EF5
Tongue-in-cheek humor just does not work in StormTrack anymore. Alas, Darren proves that no IP is needed to hang someone in this community.
Dennis: I'll second that.
Melissa Jablonski
" Warp Speed Scotty." Time travel rocks. Wouldn't want anyone sued over this. Maybe his names been hijacked .
Melissa
Melissa
Darren Addy
EF5
Not at all. The evidence is there, but it takes some deduction and reasoning to come up with a reasonable explanation. After looking at his chase vehicle, I think the most obvious explanations is that he was posting reports to Spotter Network that he heard over his ham radio from a wide area. While I think this clearly goes against the spirit of Spotter Network, I'm not sure if it is articulated fully as being against the rules. (Have to check). If it isn't then it probably should be (better articulated).
If my conclusion is accurate, then he may not exactly be exonerated, but he isn't exactly lynched either.
Last edited by a moderator:
