• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

DSLR Long Exposure Processing Question

Hearing about the buffer has really put an end to my concern. My thought was that if I was to buy a DSLR and still have that point and shoot lengthy wait in between taking a new picture, I was just going to stay with the camera I had.

I did find out that the Wait in between taking a new photo was indeed Noise reduction as well as Compression and what ever image algorithims Kodak uses. I have also found that there are alot of options Kodak has left out such as Raw photo, turning off noise reduction, limiting or turning off compression. But I imagine with a point and shoot camera the goal was to limit the photographer. I dont know. Just thought you guys might like to hear about my research.

I appreciate all the replies, I now look forward to buying a DSLR. =)
 
Yes, the noise reduction is normally the biggest issue for the delay before writing to the card. The term "processing" though is a bit general. If you are talking about the amount of time before you can take another picture, you are discussing cycle times.

True statement, but the cycle time, at least on my DSLR, is basically nonexistent. I can shoot up to ten RAW images at around three frames per second before things slow down. IIRC, the on-board noise reduction (if on) doesn't kick in until exposure times are longer than one second. With lightning shots, where exposures are more than a few seconds, the buffer never fills and the only cycle time is closing and reopening the shutter. The increase in internal bandwith from a P&S to a DSLR will blow your mind.
 
I have used the Rebel's in-camera noise reduction function twice and will never think about doing it again. For one, as mentioned before, an hour long exposure will take the camera an hour long to process. You almost need a battery pack to use it. I shot star trails last winter and the function completely removed quite a few trails. The ones that were left had been chopped up and was quite obvious that the picture had been altered, without it ever seeing Photoshop. I use Neat Image. It does an EXCELLENT job of removing noise and only takes a few seconds to do. It's a fairly inexpensive program also.
 
Back
Top