JamesCaruso
Staff member
Even IF the data were charged for (and I agree with the posts saying this cannot and/or should not be done), the cost would be immaterial relative to the other costs of chasing so I don’t see how it could be a deterrent.
I'm kind of having fun with this so bear with me. I believe you are a chasecationer correct? Would you purchase model data for $600 in order to spend a week or two on the plains to have a good handle on where/when to be? Or would you forego the cost and simply play it by SPC outlooks or whatever other data you could scrounge up and still come out to the plains knowing it would be quite a bit tougher (other than following dots on Radarscope, another problem for another day) without hi-res models, NAM, etc?.Even IF the data were charged for (and I agree with the posts saying this cannot and/or should not be done), the cost would be immaterial relative to the other costs of chasing so I don’t see how it could be a deterrent.
The big question I think everyone needs to step back and ask is how many times has convergence significantly affected your chase? For me, it's been almost never. And I'm right there with you all most of the time. The convergence fears have always been around. There are examples in the old ST print edition archives as early as 1988.
For those who weren't aware, I maintain a web site dedicated to this subject here which includes full-day timelapses from my 4-way dashcam setup of every chase I embark on in the Great Plains:
Another thing I’d like to see is stats on or maybe a heat map of when/where chaser convergence is the worst. I think we can assume it is worst in the KS/OK/TX area in May, but where else does it peak? Maybe in eastern CO when threats are close to Denver?
I live outside city limits (thankfully LOL) but still reasonably close.I moved out of Denver cause traffic was awful... one of a few reasons, but that was a topper.
And to answer your question, ever sit in that traffic with a Supercell coming at you?